XNKY.DE vs. IS0E.DE
XNKY.DE (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF) and IS0E.DE (iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XNKY.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Nikkei 225®, while IS0E.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the S&P Commodity Producers Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XNKY.DE returned 12.43%/yr vs 18.25%/yr for IS0E.DE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNKY.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for IS0E.DE.
Performance
XNKY.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNKY.DE achieves a 32.35% return, which is significantly higher than IS0E.DE's -7.03% return.
XNKY.DE
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 6.07%
- YTD
- 32.35%
- 6M
- 33.84%
- 1Y
- 59.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- —
IS0E.DE
- 1D
- 5.81%
- 1M
- -15.57%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -3.86%
- 1Y
- 50.42%
- 3Y*
- 36.13%
- 5Y*
- 18.25%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
XNKY.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNKY.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF | 32.35% | 16.16% | 14.34% | 18.03% | -15.35% | 3.16% | 13.56% |
IS0E.DE iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF | -7.03% | 129.59% | 18.76% | 6.25% | -3.74% | -3.07% | -7.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNKY.DE and IS0E.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2020 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNKY.DE vs. IS0E.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNKY.DE
IS0E.DE
XNKY.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XNKY.DE | IS0E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.21 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.59 | 1.53 | +3.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.91 | 4.31 | +9.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XNKY.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNKY.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.47%, smaller than the maximum IS0E.DE drawdown of -82.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNKY.DE and IS0E.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNKY.DE | IS0E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.47% | -82.14% | +60.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -32.80% | +19.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.16% | -32.80% | +12.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.15% | -38.05% | +16.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -28.30% | +26.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -54.08% | +46.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 11.59% | -7.30% |
Volatility
XNKY.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) is 6.59%, while iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that XNKY.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS0E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNKY.DE | IS0E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 14.22% | -7.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.61% | 34.38% | -15.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.59% | 42.45% | -18.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 32.47% | -13.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 32.12% | -13.71% |
XNKY.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNKY.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IS0E.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNKY.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNKY.DE nor IS0E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XNKY.DE and IS0E.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNKY.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNKY.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IS0E.DE.
XNKY.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while IS0E.DE is Precious Metals. XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®, while IS0E.DE tracks S&P Commodity Producers Gold. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XNKY.DE and 0.55% for IS0E.DE.
Find the right allocation for XNKY.DE and IS0E.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer