XNKY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE
XNKY.DE (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF) and DBXJ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C) are both Japan Equities funds from Xtrackers - XNKY.DE tracks the Nikkei 225® while DBXJ.DE tracks the MSCI Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XNKY.DE returned 12.43%/yr vs 10.09%/yr for DBXJ.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XNKY.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DBXJ.DE.
Performance
XNKY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNKY.DE achieves a 32.35% return, which is significantly higher than DBXJ.DE's 16.95% return.
XNKY.DE
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 32.35%
- 6M
- 30.39%
- 1Y
- 60.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- —
DBXJ.DE
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 16.95%
- 6M
- 16.85%
- 1Y
- 31.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
XNKY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNKY.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF | 32.35% | 16.16% | 14.34% | 18.03% | -15.35% | 3.16% | 13.56% |
DBXJ.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C | 16.95% | 12.59% | 13.75% | 16.43% | -12.07% | 9.57% | 9.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNKY.DE and DBXJ.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between XNKY.DE and DBXJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNKY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNKY.DE
DBXJ.DE
XNKY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNKY.DE | DBXJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.31 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.59 | 2.99 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.91 | 9.82 | +4.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNKY.DE | DBXJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 1.63 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.60 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.26 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
XNKY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNKY.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.47%, smaller than the maximum DBXJ.DE drawdown of -51.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNKY.DE and DBXJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNKY.DE | DBXJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.47% | -51.22% | +29.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -10.22% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.16% | -16.96% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.15% | -19.00% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.42% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -14.63% | +6.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 3.12% | +1.17% |
Volatility
XNKY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE) at 3.40%. This indicates that XNKY.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBXJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNKY.DE | DBXJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 3.40% | +3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.61% | 14.91% | +3.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.59% | 18.74% | +4.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 16.56% | +2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 16.38% | +2.04% |
XNKY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNKY.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DBXJ.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XNKY.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNKY.DE nor DBXJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XNKY.DE and DBXJ.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNKY.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNKY.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for DBXJ.DE.
XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®, while DBXJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XNKY.DE and 0.12% for DBXJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XNKY.DE and DBXJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer