XNAS.L vs. QQQO.L
XNAS.L (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and QQQO.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. XNAS.L is passively managed, while QQQO.L is actively managed. Over the past year, XNAS.L returned 40.41% vs 32.05% for QQQO.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XNAS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQQO.L.
Performance
XNAS.L vs. QQQO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XNAS.L is traded in USD, while QQQO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QQQO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAS.L achieves a 19.67% return, which is significantly higher than QQQO.L's 15.24% return.
XNAS.L
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 19.67%
- 6M
- 19.16%
- 1Y
- 40.41%
- 3Y*
- 28.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQO.L
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 15.24%
- 6M
- 15.34%
- 1Y
- 32.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.L vs. QQQO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 19.67% | 19.83% | 10.45% |
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 15.24% | 14.61% | 7.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.L and QQQO.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024 | 0.64 |
The correlation between XNAS.L and QQQO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNAS.L vs. QQQO.L — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.L
QQQO.L
XNAS.L vs. QQQO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNAS.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.42 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | 4.24 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.19 | 12.87 | +0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNAS.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.30 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.69 | 1.28 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
XNAS.L vs. QQQO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, which is greater than QQQO.L's maximum drawdown of -18.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.L and QQQO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.92% | -18.52% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -7.52% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -0.73% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.03% | -2.96% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.48% | +0.57% |
Volatility
XNAS.L vs. QQQO.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) at 3.88%. This indicates that XNAS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 3.88% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 9.33% | +2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 13.86% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 16.88% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 16.88% | +2.51% |
XNAS.L vs. QQQO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQO.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNAS.L vs. QQQO.L - Dividend Comparison
XNAS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 67.52% | 124.53% | 17.93% |
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XNAS.L and QQQO.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQO.L.
They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAS.L and 0.45% for QQQO.L.
Find the right allocation for XNAS.L and QQQO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer