XNAS.L vs. PNQI
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI).
XNAS.L and PNQI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XNAS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. PNQI is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Internet Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2008. Both XNAS.L and PNQI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XNAS.L vs. PNQI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XNAS.L vs. PNQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | -5.13% | 19.83% | 26.60% | 56.41% | -1.82% |
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | -17.01% | 15.56% | 29.44% | 60.69% | -4.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAS.L achieves a -5.13% return, which is significantly higher than PNQI's -17.01% return.
XNAS.L
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- -5.13%
- 6M
- -2.24%
- 1Y
- 24.79%
- 3Y*
- 23.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PNQI
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- -17.01%
- 6M
- -19.24%
- 1Y
- 0.81%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- -1.01%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XNAS.L vs. PNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PNQI's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XNAS.L vs. PNQI — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.L
PNQI
XNAS.L vs. PNQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNAS.L | PNQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 0.03 | +1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 0.22 | +1.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.03 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 0.06 | +2.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.04 | 0.17 | +9.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNAS.L | PNQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 0.03 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 0.51 | +0.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.L and PNQI is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XNAS.L vs. PNQI - Dividend Comparison
XNAS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Drawdowns
XNAS.L vs. PNQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum PNQI drawdown of -59.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.L and PNQI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.L | PNQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.92% | -59.70% | +36.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -24.85% | +12.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.52% | -21.57% | +14.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -12.93% | +9.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 8.43% | -5.48% |
Volatility
XNAS.L vs. PNQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) is 5.98%, while Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that XNAS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.L | PNQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 7.31% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 14.01% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.82% | 23.46% | -3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 26.87% | -7.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 25.25% | -5.83% |