XNAS.DE vs. XDG3.DE
XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and XDG3.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while XDG3.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XNAS.DE returned 24.64%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for XDG3.DE. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNAS.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XDG3.DE.
Performance
XNAS.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAS.DE achieves a 20.53% return, which is significantly higher than XDG3.DE's -6.02% return.
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 9.23%
- YTD
- 20.53%
- 6M
- 19.39%
- 1Y
- 37.85%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 18.79%
- 10Y*
- —
XDG3.DE
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- -6.02%
- 6M
- -6.40%
- 1Y
- 2.34%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 20.53% | 7.11% | 33.75% | 33.53% |
XDG3.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C | -6.02% | 1.47% | 9.58% | 2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.DE and XDG3.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023 | 0.32 |
The correlation between XNAS.DE and XDG3.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNAS.DE vs. XDG3.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.DE
XDG3.DE
XNAS.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNAS.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.04 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 0.17 | +3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 0.44 | +10.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNAS.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 0.16 | +2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.16 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
XNAS.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, which is greater than XDG3.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.DE and XDG3.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.25% | -20.49% | -10.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.00% | -13.31% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -20.49% | -6.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -11.91% | +11.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -5.57% | -2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 5.29% | -1.91% |
Volatility
XNAS.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) is 4.31%, while Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that XNAS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDG3.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 4.95% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.91% | 10.56% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 14.57% | +1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 13.31% | +6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 13.31% | +6.53% |
XNAS.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDG3.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNAS.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNAS.DE nor XDG3.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XNAS.DE and XDG3.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XDG3.DE.
XNAS.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XDG3.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while XDG3.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAS.DE and 0.35% for XDG3.DE.
Find the right allocation for XNAS.DE and XDG3.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer