XNAS.DE vs. EQQQ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and EQQQ.DE (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - XNAS.DE tracks the Nasdaq 100® while EQQQ.DE tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XNAS.DE returned 18.79%/yr vs 18.69%/yr for EQQQ.DE. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XNAS.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQQ.DE.

Performance

XNAS.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XNAS.DE having a 20.53% return and EQQQ.DE slightly lower at 20.52%.

XNAS.DE

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 9.23%
• YTD: 20.53%
• 6M: 19.39%
• 1Y: 37.85%
• 3Y*: 24.64%
• 5Y*: 18.79%
• 10Y*: —

EQQQ.DE

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 9.27%
• YTD: 20.52%
• 6M: 19.39%
• 1Y: 37.72%
• 3Y*: 24.54%
• 5Y*: 18.69%
• 10Y*: 21.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNAS.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C	20.53%	7.11%	33.75%	51.36%	-29.99%	33.56%
EQQQ.DE Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	20.52%	6.94%	33.67%	51.32%	-30.10%	33.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XNAS.DE and EQQQ.DE is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021	1.00

The correlation between XNAS.DE and EQQQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XNAS.DE vs. EQQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNAS.DE

XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 71
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

EQQQ.DE

EQQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
EQQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
EQQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EQQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
EQQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNAS.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XNAS.DE	EQQQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.40	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.19	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.42	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.77	3.74	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.16	11.10	+0.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XNAS.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNAS.DE and EQQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XNAS.DE	EQQQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	2.40	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93	0.93	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.80	+0.10

Drawdowns

XNAS.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.DE drawdown of -47.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.DE and EQQQ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNAS.DE	EQQQ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.25%	-47.04%	+15.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.00%	-10.05%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.72%	-26.70%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.25%	-31.30%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-0.85%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.83%	-7.35%	-0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	3.39%	-0.01%

Volatility

XNAS.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) have volatilities of 4.31% and 4.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNAS.DE	EQQQ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	4.26%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.91%	10.90%	+0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.71%	15.64%	+0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.88%	19.84%	+0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.84%	19.65%	+0.19%

XNAS.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNAS.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNAS.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

XNAS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQQQ.DE Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	0.23%	0.29%	0.37%	0.39%	0.57%	0.25%	0.41%	0.54%	0.64%	0.68%	0.78%	0.73%
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNAS.DE and EQQQ.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, XNAS.DE and EQQQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XNAS.DE or EQQQ.DE?

On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNAS.DE or EQQQ.DE?

XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.DE.

What is the main difference between XNAS.DE and EQQQ.DE?

XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while EQQQ.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAS.DE and 0.30% for EQQQ.DE.