EQQQ.DE vs. SXRV.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE).
EQQQ.DE and SXRV.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQQQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2002. SXRV.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both EQQQ.DE and SXRV.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EQQQ.DE or SXRV.DE.
Performance
EQQQ.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EQQQ.DE having a 27.33% return and SXRV.DE slightly lower at 27.30%. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: EQQQ.DE at 19.61% and SXRV.DE at 19.61%.
EQQQ.DE
27.33%
3.62%
13.87%
34.11%
21.13%
19.61%
SXRV.DE
27.30%
4.80%
13.88%
34.22%
21.05%
19.61%
Key characteristics
| EQQQ.DE | SXRV.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.03 | 2.03 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.70 | 2.71 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.38 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.53 | 2.53 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.37 | 8.35 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.06% | 4.06% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.62% | 16.60% |
| Max Drawdown | -47.04% | -31.39% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.52% | -2.51% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQQQ.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQQQ.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SXRV.DE's 0.36% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between EQQQ.DE and SXRV.DE is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EQQQ.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EQQQ.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Dividend Comparison
EQQQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while SXRV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQQ.DE Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.57% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.64% | 0.68% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.97% | 0.94% |
SXRV.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EQQQ.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -47.04%, which is greater than SXRV.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQQ.DE and SXRV.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EQQQ.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) have volatilities of 5.06% and 5.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.