PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNAS.DE vs. ANAU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNAS.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XNAS.DE is traded in EUR, while ANAU.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANAU.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XNAS.DE having a 20.53% return and ANAU.DE slightly higher at 20.62%.


XNAS.DE

1D
-0.83%
1M
9.23%
YTD
20.53%
6M
19.39%
1Y
37.85%
3Y*
24.64%
5Y*
18.79%
10Y*

ANAU.DE

1D
-0.83%
1M
9.26%
YTD
20.62%
6M
19.50%
1Y
38.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNAS.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XNAS.DE
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C
20.53%7.11%33.75%10.99%
ANAU.DE
AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc
20.62%6.81%34.15%11.12%

Correlation

The correlation between XNAS.DE and ANAU.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023

0.95

The correlation between XNAS.DE and ANAU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNAS.DE vs. ANAU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNAS.DE
XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ANAU.DE
ANAU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ANAU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNAS.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNAS.DEANAU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

3.74

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

11.11

+0.05

XNAS.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the ANAU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNAS.DE and ANAU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNAS.DEANAU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.31

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

1.38

-0.47

Drawdowns

XNAS.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, which is greater than ANAU.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.DE and ANAU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNAS.DEANAU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.25%

-26.00%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-10.15%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.83%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-4.30%

-3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

3.43%

-0.05%

Volatility

XNAS.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) is 4.31%, while AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that XNAS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANAU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNAS.DEANAU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

4.56%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

11.85%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

16.48%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.88%

19.09%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.84%

19.09%

+0.75%

XNAS.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNAS.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ANAU.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XNAS.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNAS.DE nor ANAU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, XNAS.DE and ANAU.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ANAU.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANAU.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAS.DE.

XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while ANAU.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and AXA IM. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAS.DE and 0.14% for ANAU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNAS.DE and ANAU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer