XNAQ.L vs. DFND.AS

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XNAQ.L (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and DFND.AS (iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XNAQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while DFND.AS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Both are passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNAQ.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for DFND.AS.

Performance

XNAQ.L vs. DFND.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XNAQ.L is traded in GBP, while DFND.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DFND.AS values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

XNAQ.L

• 1D: 2.42%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 17.14%
• 6M: 17.33%
• 1Y: 38.43%
• 3Y*: 23.76%
• 5Y*: 17.97%
• 10Y*: —

DFND.AS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNAQ.L vs. DFND.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C	17.14%	11.72%	20.75%
DFND.AS iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XNAQ.L and DFND.AS is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2024	0.14

Return for Risk

XNAQ.L vs. DFND.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNAQ.L

XNAQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
XNAQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XNAQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
XNAQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
XNAQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
XNAQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

DFND.AS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNAQ.L vs. DFND.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XNAQ.L	DFND.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.85	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	XNAQ.L	DFND.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.90%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.67%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.80%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XNAQ.L	DFND.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.78%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.20%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.32%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.63%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.98%	—	—

XNAQ.L vs. DFND.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNAQ.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNAQ.L vs. DFND.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNAQ.L nor DFND.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNAQ.L and DFND.AS in my portfolio?

XNAQ.L and DFND.AS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XNAQ.L or DFND.AS?

On fees, XNAQ.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNAQ.L or DFND.AS?

XNAQ.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DFND.AS.

What is the main difference between XNAQ.L and DFND.AS?

XNAQ.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DFND.AS is Industrials Equities. XNAQ.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while DFND.AS tracks S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAQ.L and 0.35% for DFND.AS.