XMWD.L vs. XSTC.L
XMWD.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XMWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMWD.L returned 11.74%/yr vs 22.91%/yr for XSTC.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMWD.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSTC.L.
Performance
XMWD.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XMWD.L is traded in USD, while XSTC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMWD.L achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 23.02% return.
XMWD.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 13.80%
- YTD
- 23.02%
- 6M
- 22.95%
- 1Y
- 51.90%
- 3Y*
- 34.02%
- 5Y*
- 22.91%
- 10Y*
- —
XMWD.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMWD.L Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 9.93% | 21.37% | 18.35% | 23.76% | -17.92% | 22.03% | 16.04% | 28.32% | -9.77% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 23.02% | 22.94% | 37.18% | 56.67% | -30.82% | 32.26% | 45.87% | 48.94% | -5.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMWD.L and XSTC.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between XMWD.L and XSTC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMWD.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMWD.L
XSTC.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
XMWD.L
XSTC.L
Financial Services
XMWD.L
XSTC.L
Industrials
XMWD.L
XSTC.L
Consumer Cyclical
XMWD.L
XSTC.L
-
Communication Services
XMWD.L
XSTC.L
Healthcare
XMWD.L
XSTC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XMWD.L
XSTC.L
-
Energy
XMWD.L
XSTC.L
Basic Materials
XMWD.L
XSTC.L
-
Utilities
XMWD.L
XSTC.L
-
Real Estate
XMWD.L
XSTC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMWD.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMWD.L
XSTC.L
XMWD.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMWD.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.42 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 2.95 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.02 | 8.80 | +4.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMWD.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.57 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.97 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.06 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
XMWD.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMWD.L drawdown since its inception was -56.59%, which is greater than XSTC.L's maximum drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMWD.L and XSTC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMWD.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.59% | -35.20% | -21.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -17.54% | +9.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.55% | -27.66% | +10.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.94% | -35.20% | +9.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -3.01% | +2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -7.34% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 5.88% | -3.90% |
Volatility
XMWD.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWD.L) is 3.41%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that XMWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMWD.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 7.06% | -3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | 15.16% | -6.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.86% | 20.09% | -8.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 23.50% | -7.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 23.43% | -6.73% |
XMWD.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMWD.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMWD.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
XMWD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMWD.L Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMWD.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XMWD.L.
XMWD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. XMWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XMWD.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.
Find the right allocation for XMWD.L and XSTC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer