XMVU.L vs. XNAS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMVU.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D) and XNAS.L (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMVU.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while XNAS.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XMVU.L returned 11.56%/yr vs 28.10%/yr for XNAS.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

XMVU.L vs. XNAS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMVU.L achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.L's 19.67% return.

XMVU.L

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.27%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: 4.34%
• 3Y*: 11.56%
• 5Y*: 7.23%
• 10Y*: —

XNAS.L

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 8.53%
• YTD: 19.67%
• 6M: 19.16%
• 1Y: 40.41%
• 3Y*: 28.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMVU.L vs. XNAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D	2.14%	7.94%	15.67%	9.79%	7.95%
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	19.67%	19.83%	26.60%	56.41%	-1.82%

Correlation

The correlation between XMVU.L and XNAS.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2022	0.47

The correlation between XMVU.L and XNAS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMVU.L vs. XNAS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMVU.L	XNAS.L
Technology	29.6%	53.7%
Financial Services	13.7%	0.2%
Healthcare	12.7%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	10.0%	7.7%
Utilities	7.6%	1.4%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	12.2%
Industrials	6.2%	3.1%
Communication Services	6.0%	15.8%
Energy	3.5%	0.6%
Real Estate	2.2%	0.1%
Basic Materials	2.2%	1.1%

Return for Risk

XMVU.L vs. XNAS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMVU.L

XMVU.L Risk / Return Rank: 19
XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
XMVU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
XMVU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 17
XMVU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
XMVU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

XNAS.L

XNAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
XNAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
XNAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
XNAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
XNAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMVU.L vs. XNAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMVU.L	XNAS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	2.54	-1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	3.51	-2.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.44	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	3.67	-2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.49	13.19	-10.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMVU.L vs. XNAS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMVU.L and XNAS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMVU.L	XNAS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56	2.54	-1.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	1.69	-0.94

Drawdowns

XMVU.L vs. XNAS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMVU.L drawdown since its inception was -32.98%, which is greater than XNAS.L's maximum drawdown of -22.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVU.L and XNAS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMVU.L	XNAS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.98%	-22.92%	-10.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.39%	-10.91%	+5.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.00%	-22.92%	+12.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-0.76%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-3.03%	-0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	3.05%	-1.31%

Volatility

XMVU.L vs. XNAS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) is 2.22%, while Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that XMVU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMVU.L	XNAS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.22%	4.96%	-2.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.35%	11.72%	-6.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.67%	15.78%	-8.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.57%	19.39%	-7.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.12%	19.39%	-6.27%

XMVU.L vs. XNAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XMVU.L and XNAS.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XMVU.L vs. XNAS.L - Dividend Comparison

XMVU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while XNAS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D	1.18%	1.24%	1.31%	1.33%	1.82%	1.27%	1.81%
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMVU.L and XNAS.L in my portfolio?

XMVU.L and XNAS.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMVU.L or XNAS.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMVU.L or XNAS.L?

XMVU.L and XNAS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

What is the main difference between XMVU.L and XNAS.L?

XMVU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XNAS.L is Nasdaq-100. XMVU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while XNAS.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index.