XMVU.L vs. HSUS.L
XMVU.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D) and HSUS.L (HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Xtrackers and HSBC respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMVU.L returned 7.26%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for HSUS.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMVU.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for HSUS.L.
Performance
XMVU.L vs. HSUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XMVU.L is traded in USD, while HSUS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSUS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMVU.L achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly lower than HSUS.L's 13.69% return.
XMVU.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
HSUS.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 7.46%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 6M
- 15.49%
- 1Y
- 34.92%
- 3Y*
- 21.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- —
XMVU.L vs. HSUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D | 2.25% | 7.94% | 15.67% | 9.79% | -9.53% | 21.63% | 7.15% |
HSUS.L HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 13.69% | 19.15% | 19.80% | 21.17% | -17.59% | 28.58% | 20.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMVU.L and HSUS.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2020 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XMVU.L and HSUS.L has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XMVU.L vs. HSUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMVU.L
HSUS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XMVU.L
HSUS.L
Financial Services
XMVU.L
HSUS.L
Healthcare
XMVU.L
HSUS.L
Consumer Defensive
XMVU.L
HSUS.L
Utilities
XMVU.L
HSUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
XMVU.L
HSUS.L
Industrials
XMVU.L
HSUS.L
Communication Services
XMVU.L
HSUS.L
Energy
XMVU.L
HSUS.L
Real Estate
XMVU.L
HSUS.L
Basic Materials
XMVU.L
HSUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMVU.L vs. HSUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMVU.L
HSUS.L
XMVU.L vs. HSUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) and HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMVU.L | HSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.57 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 4.34 | -3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 17.07 | -14.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMVU.L | HSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 3.23 | -2.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.85 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.07 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
XMVU.L vs. HSUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMVU.L drawdown since its inception was -32.98%, which is greater than HSUS.L's maximum drawdown of -25.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVU.L and HSUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMVU.L | HSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.98% | -25.41% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.39% | -8.00% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.00% | -20.00% | +10.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.74% | -25.41% | +7.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.27% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -5.22% | +1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 2.04% | -0.30% |
Volatility
XMVU.L vs. HSUS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) is 2.32%, while HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that XMVU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMVU.L | HSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.32% | 2.79% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.35% | 7.96% | -2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.67% | 10.82% | -3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.57% | 15.04% | -3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.13% | 15.37% | -2.24% |
XMVU.L vs. HSUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMVU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than HSUS.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMVU.L vs. HSUS.L - Dividend Comparison
XMVU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while HSUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSUS.L HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D | 1.18% | 1.24% | 1.31% | 1.33% | 1.82% | 1.27% | 1.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMVU.L and HSUS.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSUS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSUS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XMVU.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XMVU.L and 0.12% for HSUS.L.
Find the right allocation for XMVU.L and HSUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer