PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XMTW.L vs. IDAP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XMTW.L vs. IDAP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMTW.L (Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C) and IDAP.L (iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - XMTW.L tracks the MSCI Taiwan NR USD while IDAP.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMTW.L returned 23.25%/yr vs 7.95%/yr for IDAP.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMTW.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IDAP.L.

Performance

XMTW.L vs. IDAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (XMTW.L) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IDAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XMTW.L is traded in GBp, while IDAP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDAP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMTW.L achieves a 67.90% return, which is significantly higher than IDAP.L's 13.31% return. Over the past 10 years, XMTW.L has outperformed IDAP.L with an annualized return of 23.25%, while IDAP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.95% annualized return.

XMTW.L

1D
-1.55%
1M
14.93%
YTD
67.90%
6M
73.86%
1Y
118.61%
3Y*
41.00%
5Y*
23.21%
10Y*
23.25%

IDAP.L

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.57%
YTD
13.31%
6M
13.10%
1Y
39.60%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
7.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMTW.L vs. IDAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C		67.90%23.98%25.99%21.66%-21.11%28.96%32.40%29.87%-3.71%16.78%
IDAP.L
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS		13.31%20.45%8.04%7.81%9.70%4.37%-12.05%9.56%-10.20%6.88%

Correlation

The correlation between XMTW.L and IDAP.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2007

0.44

The correlation between XMTW.L and IDAP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.51 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMTW.L vs. IDAP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XMTW.L
IDAP.L

Technology

78.9%
1.6%

Financial Services

11.8%
30.9%

Industrials

2.8%
7.1%

Basic Materials

2.4%
16.1%

Communication Services

1.5%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
5.2%

Healthcare

0.6%
3.5%

Energy

-

5.1%

Real Estate

-

10.6%

Utilities

-

4.5%

Technology

XMTW.L
78.9%
IDAP.L
1.6%

Financial Services

XMTW.L
11.8%
IDAP.L
30.9%

Industrials

XMTW.L
2.8%
IDAP.L
7.1%

Basic Materials

XMTW.L
2.4%
IDAP.L
16.1%

Communication Services

XMTW.L
1.5%
IDAP.L
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XMTW.L
1.2%
IDAP.L
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

XMTW.L
0.8%
IDAP.L
5.2%

Healthcare

XMTW.L
0.6%
IDAP.L
3.5%

Energy

XMTW.L

-

IDAP.L
5.1%

Real Estate

XMTW.L

-

IDAP.L
10.6%

Utilities

XMTW.L

-

IDAP.L
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C

iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS

Often compared with XMTW.L:
XMTW.L vs. FRXT.LXMTW.L vs. FLXT.DEXMTW.L vs. XNAS.LXMTW.L vs. SPYI.DEXMTW.L vs. IAPD.LXMTW.L vs. XDEQ.LXMTW.L vs. XDWT.L
Often compared with IDAP.L:
IDAP.L vs. EWLIDAP.L vs. VAPX.ASIDAP.L vs. ASDV.LIDAP.L vs. DVYAIDAP.L vs. SEDY.LIDAP.L vs. HYGWIDAP.L vs. LCAL.L

Return for Risk

XMTW.L vs. IDAP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XMTW.L
XMTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XMTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
XMTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
IDAP.L
IDAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IDAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IDAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMTW.L vs. IDAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (XMTW.L) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IDAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XMTW.LIDAP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
5.22
3.28

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.92
4.43

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.84

1.58

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.03

5.04

+7.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.03

19.37

+16.66

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMTW.L vs. IDAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMTW.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.22, which is higher than the IDAP.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMTW.L and IDAP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XMTW.LIDAP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.22

3.28

+1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.82

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.16

0.49

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.29

+0.37

Drawdowns

XMTW.L vs. IDAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMTW.L drawdown since its inception was -47.86%, smaller than the maximum IDAP.L drawdown of -55.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMTW.L and IDAP.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XMTW.LIDAP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.86%

-55.27%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-7.82%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.76%

-17.11%

-11.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.18%

-17.11%

-13.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.18%

-38.20%

+8.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-3.02%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-8.42%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

2.04%

+1.24%

Volatility

XMTW.L vs. IDAP.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (XMTW.L) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IDAP.L) at 4.06%. This indicates that XMTW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XMTW.LIDAP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.41%

4.06%

+5.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.21%

9.50%

+8.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.59%

12.01%

+10.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.47%

13.25%

+7.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.06%

16.12%

+3.94%

XMTW.L vs. IDAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMTW.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IDAP.L's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMTW.L vs. IDAP.L - Dividend Comparison

XMTW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDAP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDAP.L
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS		3.65%4.22%5.36%5.72%6.92%5.59%3.49%5.52%6.04%4.55%4.54%5.47%
XMTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XMTW.L and IDAP.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IDAP.L is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDAP.L is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XMTW.L.

XMTW.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD, while IDAP.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XMTW.L and 0.59% for IDAP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMTW.L and IDAP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer