PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMPT vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XMPT vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XMPT vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XMPT
VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF
-0.80%8.01%7.01%2.55%-14.64%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
-2.26%25.50%20.10%28.81%-2.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMPT achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's -2.26% return.


XMPT

1D
2.14%
1M
-4.42%
YTD
-0.80%
6M
1.08%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
-0.99%
10Y*
2.06%

CGDV

1D
2.88%
1M
-6.44%
YTD
-2.26%
6M
1.93%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XMPT vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMPT has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XMPT vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMPT
XMPT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XMPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMPT Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XMPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMPT vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMPTCGDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

1.26

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.90

1.83

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.28

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

2.01

-1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.76

8.64

-5.88

XMPT vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMPT Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMPT and CGDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMPTCGDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

1.26

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.04

-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between XMPT and CGDV is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XMPT vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

XMPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than CGDV's 1.34% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XMPT
VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF
5.92%5.87%5.35%3.81%5.12%3.74%3.79%4.08%5.05%4.84%5.35%5.24%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.34%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XMPT vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMPT drawdown since its inception was -35.24%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMPT and CGDV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XMPTCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.24%

-21.82%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.64%

-10.91%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.73%

-7.15%

-4.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.81%

-3.72%

-5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

2.54%

-0.34%

Volatility

XMPT vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) is 3.90%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that XMPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XMPTCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

5.60%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.12%

9.27%

-4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.46%

16.77%

-8.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.24%

15.62%

-6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.33%

15.62%

-5.29%