XMMS.L vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMMS.L (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMMS.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMMS.L returned 8.45%/yr vs 19.21%/yr for QQQM. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMMS.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

XMMS.L vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XMMS.L is traded in GBp, while QQQM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQM values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMS.L achieves a 26.72% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 21.22% return.

XMMS.L

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: 6.34%
• YTD: 26.72%
• 6M: 27.92%
• 1Y: 53.72%
• 3Y*: 20.94%
• 5Y*: 8.45%
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 9.66%
• YTD: 21.22%
• 6M: 18.39%
• 1Y: 42.20%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: 19.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMS.L vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XMMS.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C	26.72%	24.71%	9.13%	2.81%	-10.67%	-1.61%	8.87%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	21.22%	12.24%	27.88%	47.26%	-24.49%	28.66%	1.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMS.L and QQQM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020	0.37

The correlation between XMMS.L and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (5 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMMS.L vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMMS.L	QQQM
Technology	36.9%	53.8%
Financial Services	19.5%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	12.3%
Industrials	7.4%	2.8%
Communication Services	7.0%	15.8%
Basic Materials	6.5%	1.1%
Energy	4.1%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	7.7%
Healthcare	2.9%	4.2%
Utilities	2.1%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

XMMS.L vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMS.L

XMMS.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
XMMS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XMMS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
XMMS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XMMS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XMMS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 75
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMS.L vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMMS.L	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.17	2.78	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.07	3.54	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.49	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.84	3.57	+1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.09	10.77	+6.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMMS.L vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMS.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMS.L and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMMS.L	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.17	2.78	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.92	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.85	-0.40

Drawdowns

XMMS.L vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMS.L drawdown since its inception was -27.76%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQM drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMS.L and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMMS.L	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.76%	-27.83%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.04%	-11.88%	+0.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.26%	-24.83%	+9.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.32%	-27.83%	+3.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	-0.54%	-1.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.00%	-6.83%	-3.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	3.93%	-0.80%

Volatility

XMMS.L vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 3.95%. This indicates that XMMS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMMS.L	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.37%	3.95%	+3.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.36%	10.91%	+3.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.90%	15.26%	+1.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.56%	20.97%	-4.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.84%	20.98%	-2.14%

XMMS.L vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMS.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XMMS.L vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

XMMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.42%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%
XMMS.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMMS.L and QQQM in my portfolio?

XMMS.L and QQQM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMMS.L or QQQM?

On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMMS.L or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XMMS.L.

What is the main difference between XMMS.L and QQQM?

XMMS.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. XMMS.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XMMS.L and 0.15% for QQQM.