PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 10.72% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 18.35%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.32% annualized return.


XMMO

1D
-0.57%
1M
-8.97%
6M
9.46%
YTD
13.17%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
24.48%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
18.35%
ALL TIME*
12.19%

VXUS

1D
-0.36%
1M
-4.26%
6M
6.22%
YTD
10.72%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
9.32%
ALL TIME*
6.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
13.17%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
10.72%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and VXUS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011

0.71

The correlation between XMMO and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMMO vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMMO
VXUS

Industrials

42.4%
14.6%

Technology

11.7%
22.1%

Energy

9.8%
4.0%

Healthcare

7.4%
6.6%

Basic Materials

6.9%
6.8%

Real Estate

6.4%
2.2%

Utilities

5.9%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
4.7%

Financial Services

2.7%
21.4%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
7.2%

Communication Services

1.5%
3.5%

Industrials

XMMO
42.4%
VXUS
14.6%

Technology

XMMO
11.7%
VXUS
22.1%

Energy

XMMO
9.8%
VXUS
4.0%

Healthcare

XMMO
7.4%
VXUS
6.6%

Basic Materials

XMMO
6.9%
VXUS
6.8%

Real Estate

XMMO
6.4%
VXUS
2.2%

Utilities

XMMO
5.9%
VXUS
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

XMMO
2.9%
VXUS
4.7%

Financial Services

XMMO
2.7%
VXUS
21.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XMMO
2.3%
VXUS
7.2%

Communication Services

XMMO
1.5%
VXUS
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMMOVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.26

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.11

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.23

7.84

-0.61

XMMO vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-35.97%

-19.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-11.27%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-13.58%

-11.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-29.44%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

-35.97%

-0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.14%

-4.58%

-5.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.42%

-8.17%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.03%

-0.27%

Volatility

XMMO vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) at 5.31%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

5.31%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.53%

14.80%

+2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.70%

16.68%

+4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.73%

16.30%

+5.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

17.00%

+5.35%

XMMO vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than VXUS's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.63%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.62%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and VXUS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to VXUS (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 18.35% vs 9.32% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 18.35% return vs 9.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 0.62% for XMMO.

XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while VXUS is Global Equities. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.05% for VXUS.

VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer