PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 11.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed VTV with an annualized return of 19.50%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.42% annualized return.


XMMO

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
19.66%
6M
19.51%
1Y
31.14%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
15.72%
10Y*
19.50%

VTV

1D
0.25%
1M
2.67%
YTD
11.91%
6M
13.41%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
12.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
19.66%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
11.91%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and VTV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2005

0.77

The correlation between XMMO and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMMO vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMMO
VTV

Industrials

41.1%
14.0%

Technology

16.7%
13.4%

Energy

7.7%
8.1%

Basic Materials

7.2%
3.1%

Healthcare

6.3%
14.5%

Real Estate

6.1%
2.8%

Utilities

5.8%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
4.0%

Financial Services

2.4%
22.3%

Communication Services

1.6%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
9.4%

Industrials

XMMO
41.1%
VTV
14.0%

Technology

XMMO
16.7%
VTV
13.4%

Energy

XMMO
7.7%
VTV
8.1%

Basic Materials

XMMO
7.2%
VTV
3.1%

Healthcare

XMMO
6.3%
VTV
14.5%

Real Estate

XMMO
6.1%
VTV
2.8%

Utilities

XMMO
5.8%
VTV
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XMMO
4.6%
VTV
4.0%

Financial Services

XMMO
2.4%
VTV
22.3%

Communication Services

XMMO
1.6%
VTV
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

XMMO
0.5%
VTV
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMMOVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.45

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

4.03

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.23

15.20

+0.02

XMMO vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMMOVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

2.52

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.82

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.75

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.51

+0.06

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-59.27%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-6.35%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-14.52%

-10.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-17.04%

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

-36.78%

+0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-1.11%

-2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-7.87%

-1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.68%

+0.39%

Volatility

XMMO vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.65%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

2.65%

+5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.07%

7.67%

+8.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

10.18%

+9.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

13.89%

+7.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

16.68%

+5.63%

XMMO vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than VTV's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.87%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.62%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and VTV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.50% vs 12.42% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.50% return vs 12.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.62% for XMMO.

XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer