PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. VLIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. VLIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund (VLIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 23.73% return, which is significantly higher than VLIFX's -1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed VLIFX with an annualized return of 19.73%, while VLIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.64% annualized return.


XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%

VLIFX

1D
0.60%
1M
0.09%
YTD
-1.36%
6M
-2.29%
1Y
-1.86%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*
11.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. VLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%
VLIFX
Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund
-1.36%0.79%7.59%22.11%-9.60%19.76%19.96%35.30%4.65%19.85%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and VLIFX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2005

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between XMMO and VLIFX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. VLIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VLIFX
VLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
VLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. VLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund (VLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMMOVLIFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

-0.10

+2.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

-0.04

+2.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.00

+0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

-0.11

+4.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.21

-0.31

+18.52

XMMO vs. VLIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the VLIFX Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and VLIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMMOVLIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

-0.10

+2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.36

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.65

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.39

+0.19

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. VLIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum VLIFX drawdown of -61.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and VLIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOVLIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-61.48%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-11.81%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-17.66%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-21.91%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

-35.51%

-1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.74%

+8.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-15.66%

+6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

4.15%

-2.11%

Volatility

XMMO vs. VLIFX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund (VLIFX) at 3.71%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOVLIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.82%

3.71%

+4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.54%

10.05%

+5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

13.44%

+5.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.45%

16.87%

+4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.27%

17.86%

+4.41%

XMMO vs. VLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than VLIFX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. VLIFX - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than VLIFX's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VLIFX
Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund
2.19%2.16%0.99%0.03%7.22%8.23%7.81%1.42%5.12%1.61%2.24%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and VLIFX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to VLIFX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs VLIFX's -61.48%.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and VLIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer