XMMO vs. SEIM
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and SEIM (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. XMMO is passively managed, while SEIM is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XMMO returned 32.10%/yr vs 29.67%/yr for SEIM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIM.
Performance
XMMO vs. SEIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 23.73% return, which is significantly higher than SEIM's 18.91% return.
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 23.73%
- 6M
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 36.97%
- 3Y*
- 32.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
SEIM
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 7.63%
- YTD
- 18.91%
- 6M
- 20.91%
- 1Y
- 36.91%
- 3Y*
- 29.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO vs. SEIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 23.73% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -1.08% |
SEIM SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF | 18.91% | 20.20% | 39.12% | 16.25% | -2.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and SEIM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between XMMO and SEIM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMMO vs. SEIM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMMO
SEIM
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
XMMO
SEIM
Technology
XMMO
SEIM
Energy
XMMO
SEIM
Basic Materials
XMMO
SEIM
Healthcare
XMMO
SEIM
Real Estate
XMMO
SEIM
Utilities
XMMO
SEIM
Consumer Cyclical
XMMO
SEIM
Financial Services
XMMO
SEIM
Communication Services
XMMO
SEIM
Consumer Defensive
XMMO
SEIM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. SEIM — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
SEIM
XMMO vs. SEIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMMO | SEIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 2.28 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.77 | 3.08 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 3.68 | +0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.21 | 16.18 | +2.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMMO | SEIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.28 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.19 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. SEIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than SEIM's maximum drawdown of -22.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and SEIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | SEIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -22.17% | -33.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -10.07% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -22.17% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.33% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -3.98% | -5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.29% | -0.25% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. SEIM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) at 4.68%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | SEIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.82% | 4.68% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | 13.33% | +2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.71% | 16.28% | +2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 18.86% | +2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 18.86% | +3.41% |
XMMO vs. SEIM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMMO vs. SEIM - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than SEIM's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIM SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF | 0.52% | 0.56% | 0.48% | 0.89% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and SEIM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to SEIM (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs SEIM's -22.17%.
On 3-year performance, XMMO leads with 32.10% vs 29.67% for SEIM. On fees, SEIM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SEIM has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 32.10% return vs 29.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEIM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.52% for SEIM.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.15% for SEIM.
SEIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and SEIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer