PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. SEIM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. SEIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 23.73% return, which is significantly higher than SEIM's 18.91% return.


XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%

SEIM

1D
-0.33%
1M
7.63%
YTD
18.91%
6M
20.91%
1Y
36.91%
3Y*
29.67%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. SEIM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-1.08%
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
18.91%20.20%39.12%16.25%-2.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and SEIM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022

0.85

The correlation between XMMO and SEIM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMMO vs. SEIM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMMO
SEIM

Industrials

41.1%
6.8%

Technology

16.7%
29.5%

Energy

7.7%
11.8%

Basic Materials

7.2%
4.7%

Healthcare

6.3%
9.5%

Real Estate

6.1%
7.2%

Utilities

5.8%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
7.2%

Financial Services

2.4%
8.1%

Communication Services

1.6%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
7.9%

Industrials

XMMO
41.1%
SEIM
6.8%

Technology

XMMO
16.7%
SEIM
29.5%

Energy

XMMO
7.7%
SEIM
11.8%

Basic Materials

XMMO
7.2%
SEIM
4.7%

Healthcare

XMMO
6.3%
SEIM
9.5%

Real Estate

XMMO
6.1%
SEIM
7.2%

Utilities

XMMO
5.8%
SEIM
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XMMO
4.6%
SEIM
7.2%

Financial Services

XMMO
2.4%
SEIM
8.1%

Communication Services

XMMO
1.6%
SEIM
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

XMMO
0.5%
SEIM
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. SEIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SEIM
SEIM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SEIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. SEIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMMOSEIMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

2.28

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

3.08

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.40

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

3.68

+0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.21

16.18

+2.03

XMMO vs. SEIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the SEIM Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and SEIM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMMOSEIMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.28

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.19

-0.61

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. SEIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than SEIM's maximum drawdown of -22.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and SEIM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOSEIMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-22.17%

-33.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-10.07%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-22.17%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.33%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-3.98%

-5.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.29%

-0.25%

Volatility

XMMO vs. SEIM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) at 4.68%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOSEIMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.82%

4.68%

+3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.54%

13.33%

+2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

16.28%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.45%

18.86%

+2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.27%

18.86%

+3.41%

XMMO vs. SEIM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. SEIM - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than SEIM's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
0.52%0.56%0.48%0.89%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and SEIM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to SEIM (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs SEIM's -22.17%.

On 3-year performance, XMMO leads with 32.10% vs 29.67% for SEIM. On fees, SEIM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SEIM has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 32.10% return vs 29.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEIM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.52% for SEIM.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.15% for SEIM.

SEIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and SEIM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer