PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. RDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. RDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Redwire Corporation (RDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly lower than RDW's 98.95% return.


XMMO

1D
0.96%
1M
0.99%
YTD
22.77%
6M
22.33%
1Y
36.63%
3Y*
30.62%
5Y*
15.91%
10Y*
19.95%

RDW

1D
-11.53%
1M
31.94%
YTD
98.95%
6M
107.41%
1Y
-21.74%
3Y*
79.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. RDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
22.77%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%3.81%
RDW
Redwire Corporation
98.95%-53.83%477.54%43.94%-70.67%-34.15%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and RDW is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2021

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. RDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

RDW
RDW Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDW Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDW Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. RDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Redwire Corporation (RDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMMORDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.07

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

-0.29

+4.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.54

-0.42

+17.96

XMMO vs. RDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the RDW Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and RDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. RDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum RDW drawdown of -87.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and RDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMORDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-87.26%

+31.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-75.40%

+67.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-80.28%

+55.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-41.62%

+40.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.44%

-59.30%

+49.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

51.88%

-49.79%

Volatility

XMMO vs. RDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) is 9.07%, while Redwire Corporation (RDW) has a volatility of 53.68%. This indicates that XMMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMORDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

53.68%

-44.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.76%

94.49%

-77.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.74%

118.63%

-98.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.62%

96.83%

-75.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

96.83%

-74.48%

Dividends

XMMO vs. RDW - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while RDW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDW
Redwire Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.61%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and RDW have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDW has higher volatility (53.68%) compared to XMMO (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs RDW's -87.26%.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and RDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer