XMMO vs. FDVV

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMMO returned 15.91%/yr vs 13.53%/yr for FDVV. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.

Performance

XMMO vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 9.30% return.

XMMO

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 22.77%
• 6M: 22.33%
• 1Y: 37.93%
• 3Y*: 30.62%
• 5Y*: 15.91%
• 10Y*: 19.95%

FDVV

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 2.54%
• YTD: 9.30%
• 6M: 9.44%
• 1Y: 23.92%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: 13.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	22.77%	13.04%	38.03%	20.39%	-16.02%	16.69%	29.17%	36.78%	6.12%	37.18%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	9.30%	17.08%	21.81%	18.00%	-4.21%	29.24%	2.80%	24.07%	-1.26%	14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and FDVV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016	0.73

The correlation between XMMO and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMMO vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMMO	FDVV
Industrials	40.8%	3.0%
Technology	19.1%	30.5%
Basic Materials	7.0%	-
Energy	6.8%	-
Healthcare	6.3%	3.0%
Real Estate	5.7%	9.9%
Utilities	5.7%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	13.6%
Financial Services	2.3%	17.0%
Communication Services	1.4%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	10.7%

Return for Risk

XMMO vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO

XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 74
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 63
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 73
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMMO	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	2.24	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	3.14	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.41	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.41	2.44	+1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.54	10.11	+7.43

XMMO vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than FDVV's maximum drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and FDVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMMO	FDVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.37%	-40.25%	-15.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	-9.30%	+0.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.93%	-15.90%	-9.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.91%	-20.18%	-7.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.19%	-0.29%	-0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.44%	-3.80%	-5.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	2.24%	-0.15%

Volatility

XMMO vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.16%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMMO	FDVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.07%	3.16%	+5.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.76%	8.16%	+8.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.74%	10.12%	+9.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.62%	14.76%	+6.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.35%	16.98%	+5.37%

XMMO vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMMO vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than FDVV's 2.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.70%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%	0.00%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	0.61%	0.78%	0.34%	0.80%	1.43%	0.41%	0.61%	0.60%	0.19%	0.21%	0.22%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMMO and FDVV in my portfolio?

XMMO and FDVV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XMMO or FDVV?

XMMO has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to FDVV (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

Which ETF is better, XMMO or FDVV?

On 5-year performance, XMMO leads with 15.91% vs 13.53% for FDVV. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XMMO or FDVV?

Over the 5-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 15.91% return vs 13.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMMO or FDVV?

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMMO or FDVV?

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.61% for XMMO.

What is the main difference between XMMO and FDVV?

XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.29% for FDVV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.