PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than AVDV's 13.22% return.


XMMO

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
19.66%
6M
19.51%
1Y
31.14%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
15.72%
10Y*
19.50%

AVDV

1D
0.26%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
13.22%
6M
16.29%
1Y
40.16%
3Y*
26.61%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
19.66%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%4.77%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
13.22%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and AVDV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.67

The correlation between XMMO and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMMO vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMMO
AVDV

Industrials

41.1%
21.3%

Technology

16.7%
6.4%

Energy

7.7%
10.8%

Basic Materials

7.2%
22.5%

Healthcare

6.3%
2.1%

Real Estate

6.1%
1.1%

Utilities

5.8%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
14.4%

Financial Services

2.4%
13.7%

Communication Services

1.6%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
3.4%

Industrials

XMMO
41.1%
AVDV
21.3%

Technology

XMMO
16.7%
AVDV
6.4%

Energy

XMMO
7.7%
AVDV
10.8%

Basic Materials

XMMO
7.2%
AVDV
22.5%

Healthcare

XMMO
6.3%
AVDV
2.1%

Real Estate

XMMO
6.1%
AVDV
1.1%

Utilities

XMMO
5.8%
AVDV
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XMMO
4.6%
AVDV
14.4%

Financial Services

XMMO
2.4%
AVDV
13.7%

Communication Services

XMMO
1.6%
AVDV
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

XMMO
0.5%
AVDV
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMMOAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.46

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

3.06

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.23

12.34

+2.88

XMMO vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMMOAVDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

2.54

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.77

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.78

-0.21

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than AVDV's maximum drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-43.01%

-12.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-13.19%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-14.17%

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-28.08%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-3.74%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-6.77%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

3.26%

-1.19%

Volatility

XMMO vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) at 5.49%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

5.49%

+2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.07%

13.49%

+2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

15.92%

+3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

17.35%

+4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

19.75%

+2.56%

XMMO vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than AVDV's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.81%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.62%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and AVDV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to AVDV (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

On 5-year performance, XMMO leads with 15.72% vs 13.33% for AVDV. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 15.72% return vs 13.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.62% for XMMO.

XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer