PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. AIRR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has underperformed AIRR with an annualized return of 19.95%, while AIRR has yielded a comparatively higher 22.05% annualized return.


XMMO

1D
0.96%
1M
0.99%
YTD
22.77%
6M
22.33%
1Y
36.63%
3Y*
30.62%
5Y*
15.91%
10Y*
19.95%

AIRR

1D
0.83%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
31.74%
6M
28.77%
1Y
65.25%
3Y*
35.29%
5Y*
25.46%
10Y*
22.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
22.77%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
31.74%27.92%33.45%31.43%-2.08%33.01%17.17%33.97%-20.57%16.28%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and AIRR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2014

0.75

The correlation between XMMO and AIRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMMO vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMMO
AIRR

Industrials

41.1%
84.6%

Technology

16.7%
0.5%

Energy

7.7%
3.8%

Basic Materials

7.2%

-

Healthcare

6.3%

-

Real Estate

6.1%

-

Utilities

5.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%

-

Financial Services

2.4%
9.6%

Communication Services

1.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.5%

-

Industrials

XMMO
41.1%
AIRR
84.6%

Technology

XMMO
16.7%
AIRR
0.5%

Energy

XMMO
7.7%
AIRR
3.8%

Basic Materials

XMMO
7.2%
AIRR

-

Healthcare

XMMO
6.3%
AIRR

-

Real Estate

XMMO
6.1%
AIRR

-

Utilities

XMMO
5.8%
AIRR

-

Consumer Cyclical

XMMO
4.6%
AIRR

-

Financial Services

XMMO
2.4%
AIRR
9.6%

Communication Services

XMMO
1.6%
AIRR

-

Consumer Defensive

XMMO
0.5%
AIRR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMMOAIRRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

5.01

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.54

18.33

-0.79

XMMO vs. AIRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the AIRR Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and AIRR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than AIRR's maximum drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and AIRR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOAIRRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-42.37%

-13.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-13.09%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-27.95%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-27.95%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

-42.37%

+5.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-1.89%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.44%

-7.48%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

3.57%

-1.48%

Volatility

XMMO vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) have volatilities of 9.07% and 9.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOAIRRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

9.32%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.76%

20.81%

-4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.74%

26.19%

-6.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.62%

25.45%

-3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

26.36%

-4.01%

XMMO vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.13%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.61%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and AIRR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIRR has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to XMMO (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs AIRR's -42.37%.

On 10-year performance, AIRR leads with 22.05% vs 19.95% for XMMO. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 22.05% return vs 19.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.

XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.

XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while AIRR is Building & Construction. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.69% for AIRR.

AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and AIRR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer