XMME.DE vs. XDWH.DE
XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XMME.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMME.DE returned 8.66%/yr vs 5.50%/yr for XDWH.DE. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMME.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
XMME.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMME.DE achieves a 30.06% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's -1.98% return.
XMME.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 7.79%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 31.13%
- 1Y
- 51.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.54%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
XMME.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 30.06% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.57% | 21.91% | -11.16% | 7.23% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | -0.07% | 30.55% | 2.69% | 27.24% | 5.96% | -4.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMME.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XMME.DE and XDWH.DE has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMME.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMME.DE
XDWH.DE
XMME.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMME.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.13 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.98 | 0.93 | +4.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.04 | 2.28 | +15.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMME.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00 | 0.70 | +2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.41 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.55 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
XMME.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMME.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.96%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMME.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMME.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.96% | -26.08% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.67% | -10.32% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.16% | -21.12% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.38% | -21.12% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -8.51% | +7.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.53% | -4.82% | -4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 4.20% | -1.25% |
Volatility
XMME.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.81%. This indicates that XMME.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMME.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 4.81% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.90% | 9.51% | +5.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.70% | 13.69% | +4.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 13.43% | +3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 14.69% | +3.92% |
XMME.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMME.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMME.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMME.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMME.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
XMME.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XMME.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMME.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer