PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMME.DE vs. H410.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMME.DE vs. H410.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XMME.DE having a 20.01% return and H410.DE slightly lower at 19.79%.


XMME.DE

1D
-1.97%
1M
-8.18%
6M
11.33%
YTD
20.01%
1Y
33.43%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*

H410.DE

1D
-1.87%
1M
-8.04%
6M
12.07%
YTD
19.79%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
8.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMME.DE vs. H410.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMME.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
20.01%18.69%13.82%5.89%-15.00%4.75%6.58%21.91%-11.16%-2.35%
H410.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
19.79%18.65%13.95%4.67%-13.87%4.04%6.95%21.14%-11.36%8.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XMME.DE and H410.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2017

0.99

The correlation between XMME.DE and H410.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMME.DE vs. H410.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMME.DE
XMME.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

H410.DE
H410.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
H410.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H410.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
H410.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
H410.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
H410.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMME.DE vs. H410.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMME.DEH410.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.17

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.31

9.64

-0.33

XMME.DE vs. H410.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the H410.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMME.DE and H410.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMME.DE vs. H410.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMME.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.95%, smaller than the maximum H410.DE drawdown of -41.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMME.DE and H410.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMME.DEH410.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.95%

-41.02%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-10.71%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.16%

-19.01%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

-22.77%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.00%

-10.71%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-13.30%

+3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

3.53%

+0.05%

Volatility

XMME.DE vs. H410.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) have volatilities of 8.51% and 8.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMME.DEH410.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.51%

8.22%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

17.70%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.34%

20.15%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

17.18%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.07%

18.31%

+0.76%

XMME.DE vs. H410.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMME.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than H410.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XMME.DE vs. H410.DE - Dividend Comparison

XMME.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H410.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H410.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
1.71%2.00%2.40%2.59%3.11%2.00%1.69%2.03%2.20%1.62%1.71%2.28%
XMME.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XMME.DE and H410.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, H410.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H410.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XMME.DE.

Both ETFs track MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XMME.DE and 0.15% for H410.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMME.DE and H410.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer