H410.DE vs. 2B7K.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE).
H410.DE and 2B7K.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. H410.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets. It was launched on Sep 5, 2011. 2B7K.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. It was launched on Dec 7, 2018. Both H410.DE and 2B7K.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: H410.DE or 2B7K.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between H410.DE and 2B7K.DE is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
H410.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
H410.DE:
1.16
2B7K.DE:
1.35
H410.DE:
1.66
2B7K.DE:
1.86
H410.DE:
1.21
2B7K.DE:
1.26
H410.DE:
0.93
2B7K.DE:
1.97
H410.DE:
5.09
2B7K.DE:
7.47
H410.DE:
3.16%
2B7K.DE:
2.20%
H410.DE:
13.87%
2B7K.DE:
12.20%
H410.DE:
-36.25%
2B7K.DE:
-31.65%
H410.DE:
-2.47%
2B7K.DE:
-1.64%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, H410.DE achieves a 4.50% return, which is significantly higher than 2B7K.DE's 2.21% return.
H410.DE
4.50%
5.63%
10.70%
17.99%
3.24%
4.25%
2B7K.DE
2.21%
2.11%
13.28%
16.42%
10.97%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
H410.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
H410.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B7K.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
H410.DE vs. 2B7K.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
H410.DE
2B7K.DE
H410.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
H410.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Dividend Comparison
H410.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, while 2B7K.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H410.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD | 2.25% | 2.40% | 2.58% | 3.11% | 2.00% | 1.69% | 2.03% | 2.20% | 1.62% | 1.71% | 2.28% | 1.88% |
2B7K.DE iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
H410.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum H410.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.25%, which is greater than 2B7K.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H410.DE and 2B7K.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
H410.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) is 3.96%, while iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that H410.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B7K.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.