XMM.TO vs. XEF.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF (XMM.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO).

XMM.TO and XEF.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMM.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar EM GR CAD. It was launched on Jul 24, 2012. XEF.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD. It was launched on Apr 10, 2013. Both XMM.TO and XEF.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XMM.TO vs. XEF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF (XMM.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XMM.TO vs. XEF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMM.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF	2.23%	7.65%	16.66%	4.10%	-7.83%	3.95%	4.32%	1.36%	2.35%	18.74%
XEF.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF	2.29%	25.69%	12.04%	15.21%	-9.53%	10.36%	6.13%	15.86%	-6.65%	18.19%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XMM.TO having a 2.23% return and XEF.TO slightly higher at 2.29%. Over the past 10 years, XMM.TO has underperformed XEF.TO with an annualized return of 5.15%, while XEF.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.32% annualized return.

XMM.TO

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: -4.16%
• YTD: 2.23%
• 6M: 2.63%
• 1Y: 9.61%
• 3Y*: 9.43%
• 5Y*: 4.61%
• 10Y*: 5.15%

XEF.TO

• 1D: 2.93%
• 1M: -6.27%
• YTD: 2.29%
• 6M: 5.53%
• 1Y: 19.64%
• 3Y*: 15.35%
• 5Y*: 9.83%
• 10Y*: 9.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMM.TO vs. XEF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMM.TO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XEF.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.

XMM.TO

iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF

XEF.TO

iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF

Return for Risk

XMM.TO vs. XEF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMM.TO

XMM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 41
XMM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
XMM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
XMM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 41
XMM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
XMM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 40

XEF.TO

XEF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 70
XEF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
XEF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
XEF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
XEF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
XEF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMM.TO vs. XEF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF (XMM.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMM.TO	XEF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	1.20	-0.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	1.70	-0.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.25	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	1.68	-0.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.81	6.40	-2.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMM.TO vs. XEF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the XEF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMM.TO and XEF.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMM.TO	XEF.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76	1.20	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.74	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.63	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.68	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between XMM.TO and XEF.TO is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XMM.TO vs. XEF.TO - Dividend Comparison

XMM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than XEF.TO's 2.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XMM.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF	2.32%	2.37%	2.95%	2.55%	1.55%	1.91%	2.09%	2.44%	2.21%	2.09%	2.32%	2.16%
XEF.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF	2.38%	2.43%	2.76%	2.75%	2.93%	2.42%	1.93%	2.72%	2.76%	2.10%	2.42%	2.42%

Drawdowns

XMM.TO vs. XEF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMM.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum XEF.TO drawdown of -28.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMM.TO and XEF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMM.TO	XEF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.07%	-28.51%	+6.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.76%	-11.28%	+2.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.42%	-24.58%	+9.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.07%	-28.51%	+6.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.49%	-6.82%	+1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.26%	-4.64%	-0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	2.96%	-0.28%

Volatility

XMM.TO vs. XEF.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF (XMM.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) have volatilities of 7.37% and 7.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMM.TO	XEF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.37%	7.56%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.54%	10.39%	-0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.72%	16.40%	-3.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.10%	13.37%	-3.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.86%	14.76%	-2.90%