PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XMM.TO vs. HTAE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

XMM.TO vs. HTAE.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF (XMM.TO) and Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO).

XMM.TO and HTAE.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMM.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar EM GR CAD. It was launched on Jul 24, 2012. HTAE.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Oct 20, 2022.

Performance

XMM.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF (XMM.TO) and Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XMM.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XMM.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF		2.23%7.65%16.66%4.10%5.85%
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units		-12.04%13.49%28.26%68.45%-3.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMM.TO achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than HTAE.TO's -12.04% return.

XMM.TO

1D
2.63%
1M
-4.16%
YTD
2.23%
6M
2.63%
1Y
9.61%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
5.15%

HTAE.TO

1D
3.17%
1M
-6.03%
YTD
-12.04%
6M
-10.42%
1Y
14.40%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF

Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units

Often compared with XMM.TO:
XMM.TO vs. XSEM.TOXMM.TO vs. XMU.TOXMM.TO vs. XEQT.TOXMM.TO vs. XEC.TOXMM.TO vs. SPMOXMM.TO vs. VEE.TOXMM.TO vs. XEF.TO
Often compared with HTAE.TO:
HTAE.TO vs. HHIS.TOHTAE.TO vs. QMAX.TOHTAE.TO vs. QQCL.TOHTAE.TO vs. HDIF.TOHTAE.TO vs. QQC-F.TOHTAE.TO vs. HDIV.TOHTAE.TO vs. SPY

XMM.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMM.TO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than HTAE.TO's 2.49% expense ratio.

HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units
XMM.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF

Return for Risk

XMM.TO vs. HTAE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XMM.TO
XMM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
XMM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
XMM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO
HTAE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
HTAE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMM.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF (XMM.TO) and Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XMM.TOHTAE.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

0.49

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.12

0.90

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.13

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

0.79

+0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.81

2.46

+1.35

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMM.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the HTAE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMM.TO and HTAE.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XMM.TOHTAE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

0.49

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.89

-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between XMM.TO and HTAE.TO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

XMM.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Dividend Comparison

XMM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than HTAE.TO's 12.21% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XMM.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF		2.32%2.37%2.95%2.55%1.55%1.91%2.09%2.44%2.21%2.09%2.32%2.16%
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units		12.21%11.28%10.01%9.38%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XMM.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMM.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum HTAE.TO drawdown of -30.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMM.TO and HTAE.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

XMM.TOHTAE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.07%

-30.83%

+8.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-18.39%

+9.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.07%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.49%

-15.80%

+10.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-4.67%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

5.88%

-3.20%

Volatility

XMM.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Min Vol Emerging Markets Index ETF (XMM.TO) and Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO) have volatilities of 7.37% and 7.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

XMM.TOHTAE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

7.70%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.54%

16.87%

-7.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.72%

29.77%

-17.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.10%

27.01%

-16.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.86%

27.01%

-15.15%