PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMID.L vs. XXSC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMID.L vs. XXSC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMID.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMID.L achieves a -39.40% return, which is significantly lower than XXSC.L's 6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XMID.L has underperformed XXSC.L with an annualized return of -3.59%, while XXSC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.44% annualized return.


XMID.L

1D
-2.16%
1M
-19.47%
YTD
-39.40%
6M
-40.52%
1Y
-39.13%
3Y*
-23.13%
5Y*
-9.05%
10Y*
-3.59%

XXSC.L

1D
0.56%
1M
2.62%
YTD
6.58%
6M
9.35%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
11.84%
5Y*
4.26%
10Y*
8.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMID.L vs. XXSC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMID.L
Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C
-39.40%-8.44%-12.66%-0.27%14.84%1.39%-10.64%3.73%-4.01%12.41%
XXSC.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C
6.58%22.28%0.76%10.44%-17.50%15.39%10.55%24.87%-14.91%23.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XMID.L and XXSC.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2010

0.32

XMID.L vs. XXSC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMID.L
XXSC.L

Financial Services

51.0%
15.3%

Basic Materials

17.2%
7.5%

Communication Services

9.5%
5.0%

Industrials

8.3%
26.6%

Energy

4.6%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.5%

Technology

3.3%
7.4%

Utilities

2.4%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.4%

Healthcare

-

7.3%

Real Estate

-

8.3%

Financial Services

XMID.L
51.0%
XXSC.L
15.3%

Basic Materials

XMID.L
17.2%
XXSC.L
7.5%

Communication Services

XMID.L
9.5%
XXSC.L
5.0%

Industrials

XMID.L
8.3%
XXSC.L
26.6%

Energy

XMID.L
4.6%
XXSC.L
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

XMID.L
3.7%
XXSC.L
3.5%

Technology

XMID.L
3.3%
XXSC.L
7.4%

Utilities

XMID.L
2.4%
XXSC.L
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XMID.L

-

XXSC.L
11.4%

Healthcare

XMID.L

-

XXSC.L
7.3%

Real Estate

XMID.L

-

XXSC.L
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMID.L vs. XXSC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMID.L
XMID.L Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
XMID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
XMID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

XXSC.L
XXSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XXSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMID.L vs. XXSC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMID.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMID.LXXSC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.71

1.23

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

1.44

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.56

5.17

-7.74

XMID.L vs. XXSC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMID.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.59, which is lower than the XXSC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMID.L and XXSC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMID.LXXSC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.59

1.25

-2.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

0.27

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.15

0.55

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.76

-0.88

Drawdowns

XMID.L vs. XXSC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMID.L drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, which is greater than XXSC.L's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMID.L and XXSC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMID.LXXSC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.27%

-35.12%

-23.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.58%

-10.79%

-31.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.16%

-12.84%

-41.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.27%

-30.74%

-27.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.27%

-35.12%

-23.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.27%

-1.31%

-56.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-7.53%

-10.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.24%

3.02%

+12.22%

Volatility

XMID.L vs. XXSC.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMID.L) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) at 3.95%. This indicates that XMID.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XXSC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMID.LXXSC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

3.95%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.74%

10.48%

+9.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.49%

12.50%

+11.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.06%

16.01%

+4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.32%

16.27%

+7.05%

XMID.L vs. XXSC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMID.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XXSC.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMID.L vs. XXSC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMID.L nor XXSC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XMID.L
Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XXSC.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMID.L and XXSC.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XXSC.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XXSC.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XMID.L.

XMID.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XXSC.L is Europe Equities. XMID.L tracks MSCI Indonesia NR IDR, while XXSC.L tracks MSCI Europe Small Cap NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XMID.L and 0.30% for XXSC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMID.L and XXSC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer