XMI.TO vs. VIDY.TO
XMI.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF) and VIDY.TO (Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - XMI.TO tracks the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index while VIDY.TO tracks the FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMI.TO returned 8.34%/yr vs 16.44%/yr for VIDY.TO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMI.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for VIDY.TO.
Performance
XMI.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMI.TO achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly lower than VIDY.TO's 17.58% return.
XMI.TO
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 14.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.24%
- 5Y*
- 8.34%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.10%
VIDY.TO
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 13.54%
- YTD
- 17.58%
- 1Y
- 31.61%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$1.96M | CA$2.16M | CA$2.22M | |
| CA$47.75K | CA$79.69K | CA$218.68K |
XMI.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMI.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF | 9.90% | 19.69% | 13.51% | 9.32% | -10.50% | 7.01% | -2.02% | 9.84% | -2.69% |
VIDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 17.58% | 35.07% | 11.97% | 15.46% | 1.57% | 14.26% | -2.63% | 12.64% | -6.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMI.TO and VIDY.TO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2018 | 0.64 |
The correlation between XMI.TO and VIDY.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMI.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMI.TO
VIDY.TO
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
XMI.TO
VIDY.TO
Industrials
XMI.TO
VIDY.TO
Consumer Defensive
XMI.TO
VIDY.TO
Healthcare
XMI.TO
VIDY.TO
Communication Services
XMI.TO
VIDY.TO
Utilities
XMI.TO
VIDY.TO
Energy
XMI.TO
VIDY.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XMI.TO
VIDY.TO
Technology
XMI.TO
VIDY.TO
Real Estate
XMI.TO
VIDY.TO
Basic Materials
XMI.TO
VIDY.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMI.TO vs. VIDY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XMI.TO
VIDY.TO
XMI.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (XMI.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VIDY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMI.TO | VIDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.44 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 3.03 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.63 | 11.68 | -5.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMI.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMI.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.08%, smaller than the maximum VIDY.TO drawdown of -31.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMI.TO and VIDY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMI.TO | VIDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.08% | -31.99% | +8.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.12% | -10.48% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.97% | -13.89% | +5.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.18% | -19.01% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.11% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.02% | -4.21% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 2.71% | -0.57% |
Volatility
XMI.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (XMI.TO) is 2.80%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VIDY.TO) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that XMI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIDY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMI.TO | VIDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | 3.19% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.27% | 11.10% | -2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 13.27% | -2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.92% | 13.53% | -3.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 16.38% | -5.02% |
XMI.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMI.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VIDY.TO's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMI.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Dividend Comparison
XMI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than VIDY.TO's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 2.87% | 2.80% | 3.64% | 3.91% | 4.39% | 3.30% | 3.36% | 3.37% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMI.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF | 2.60% | 2.69% | 2.64% | 2.56% | 1.98% | 1.93% | 1.16% | 3.74% | 2.93% | 2.07% | 3.29% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMI.TO and VIDY.TO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VIDY.TO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VIDY.TO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XMI.TO.
XMI.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index, while VIDY.TO tracks FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for XMI.TO and 0.31% for VIDY.TO.
Find the right allocation for XMI.TO and VIDY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer