XMI.TO vs. XMU.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (XMI.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMU.TO).
XMI.TO and XMU.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMI.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2012. XMU.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2012. Both XMI.TO and XMU.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XMI.TO or XMU.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between XMI.TO and XMU.TO is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XMI.TO vs. XMU.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XMI.TO:
1.98
XMU.TO:
2.12
XMI.TO:
2.79
XMU.TO:
3.04
XMI.TO:
1.38
XMU.TO:
1.42
XMI.TO:
4.03
XMU.TO:
3.02
XMI.TO:
10.19
XMU.TO:
10.41
XMI.TO:
1.63%
XMU.TO:
1.95%
XMI.TO:
8.40%
XMU.TO:
9.60%
XMI.TO:
-23.08%
XMU.TO:
-27.31%
XMI.TO:
-0.02%
XMU.TO:
-2.40%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMI.TO achieves a 5.07% return, which is significantly higher than XMU.TO's 3.84% return. Over the past 10 years, XMI.TO has underperformed XMU.TO with an annualized return of 4.98%, while XMU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.71% annualized return.
XMI.TO
5.07%
4.07%
4.43%
16.56%
3.72%
4.98%
XMU.TO
3.84%
1.48%
6.61%
19.06%
7.93%
10.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMI.TO vs. XMU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMI.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XMU.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XMI.TO vs. XMU.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XMI.TO
XMU.TO
XMI.TO vs. XMU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (XMI.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XMI.TO vs. XMU.TO - Dividend Comparison
XMI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than XMU.TO's 1.13% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMI.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF | 2.51% | 2.64% | 2.56% | 1.99% | 1.93% | 1.16% | 3.74% | 2.92% | 2.07% | 3.29% | 2.02% | 3.05% |
XMU.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF | 1.13% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 1.14% | 1.04% | 1.64% | 1.40% | 1.44% | 1.55% | 1.78% | 1.40% | 4.84% |
Drawdowns
XMI.TO vs. XMU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMI.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.08%, smaller than the maximum XMU.TO drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMI.TO and XMU.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XMI.TO vs. XMU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (XMI.TO) is 2.75%, while iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMU.TO) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that XMI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.