XMHQ vs. LOPP
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP).
XMHQ and LOPP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. LOPP is an actively managed fund by Gabelli. It was launched on Feb 1, 2021.
Performance
XMHQ vs. LOPP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XMHQ vs. LOPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 1.08% | 4.71% | 16.79% | 29.51% | -12.42% | 16.23% |
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF | 4.90% | 22.61% | 9.89% | 4.74% | -15.04% | 19.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMHQ achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than LOPP's 4.90% return.
XMHQ
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -4.48%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 13.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
LOPP
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.97%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMHQ vs. LOPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMHQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LOPP's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XMHQ vs. LOPP — Risk / Return Rank
XMHQ
LOPP
XMHQ vs. LOPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMHQ | LOPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 1.70 | -1.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 2.38 | -1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.32 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 2.59 | -1.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | 10.96 | -6.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMHQ | LOPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 1.70 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.47 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between XMHQ and LOPP is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XMHQ vs. LOPP - Dividend Comparison
XMHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than LOPP's 0.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 5.20% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.63% | 1.34% |
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF | 0.79% | 0.83% | 1.88% | 2.23% | 2.01% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XMHQ vs. LOPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMHQ drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, which is greater than LOPP's maximum drawdown of -25.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMHQ and LOPP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMHQ | LOPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.19% | -25.28% | -32.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -12.31% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | -25.28% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.36% | -6.90% | +1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.35% | -8.46% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 2.91% | +0.52% |
Volatility
XMHQ vs. LOPP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) is 6.03%, while Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that XMHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XMHQ | LOPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 7.24% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.37% | 11.79% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.26% | 18.94% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 17.75% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 17.61% | +3.08% |