PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMEU.L vs. VNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMEU.L vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XMEU.L is traded in GBp, while VNQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VNQ values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMEU.L achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly lower than VNQ's 11.66% return. Over the past 10 years, XMEU.L has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 10.17%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.40% annualized return.


XMEU.L

1D
0.54%
1M
1.15%
YTD
6.81%
6M
8.75%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
10.17%

VNQ

1D
1.35%
1M
1.58%
YTD
11.66%
6M
9.76%
1Y
14.49%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
3.92%
10Y*
6.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMEU.L vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMEU.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C
6.81%25.81%3.60%13.26%-3.48%16.84%2.45%19.45%-9.45%14.83%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
11.66%-4.11%6.64%6.26%-17.48%41.87%-7.41%24.01%-0.45%-4.17%

Correlation

The correlation between XMEU.L and VNQ is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2007

0.26

XMEU.L vs. VNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMEU.L
VNQ

Financial Services

23.6%
0.1%

Industrials

20.2%
0.0%

Healthcare

13.3%

-

Technology

8.7%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%

-

Energy

5.4%
0.1%

Basic Materials

5.0%
1.1%

Utilities

4.8%

-

Communication Services

3.7%
0.6%

Real Estate

0.8%
97.3%

Financial Services

XMEU.L
23.6%
VNQ
0.1%

Industrials

XMEU.L
20.2%
VNQ
0.0%

Healthcare

XMEU.L
13.3%
VNQ

-

Technology

XMEU.L
8.7%
VNQ
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

XMEU.L
8.0%
VNQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

XMEU.L
6.4%
VNQ

-

Energy

XMEU.L
5.4%
VNQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

XMEU.L
5.0%
VNQ
1.1%

Utilities

XMEU.L
4.8%
VNQ

-

Communication Services

XMEU.L
3.7%
VNQ
0.6%

Real Estate

XMEU.L
0.8%
VNQ
97.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMEU.L vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMEU.L
XMEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XMEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMEU.L vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMEU.LVNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.20

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.96

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

5.51

+1.14

XMEU.L vs. VNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMEU.L and VNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMEU.LVNQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.12

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.22

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.31

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.28

+0.15

Drawdowns

XMEU.L vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMEU.L drawdown since its inception was -44.27%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -57.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMEU.L and VNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMEU.LVNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.27%

-57.05%

+12.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-7.44%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.16%

-18.24%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.60%

-28.76%

+13.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.55%

-35.51%

+6.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-2.39%

+1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-10.79%

+4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.64%

+0.22%

Volatility

XMEU.L vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) have volatilities of 3.78% and 3.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMEU.LVNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

3.64%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

9.59%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

13.00%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

17.60%

-3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.86%

20.61%

-5.75%

XMEU.L vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMEU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XMEU.L vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

XMEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.60%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%
XMEU.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMEU.L and VNQ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMEU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMEU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VNQ.

XMEU.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while VNQ is REIT. XMEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XMEU.L and 0.13% for VNQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMEU.L and VNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer