XMEU.L vs. EUNL.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE).
XMEU.L and EUNL.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMEU.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Jan 10, 2007. EUNL.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both XMEU.L and EUNL.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XMEU.L or EUNL.DE.
Key characteristics
XMEU.L | EUNL.DE | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 3.88% | 22.81% |
1Y Return | 12.38% | 30.77% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 3.98% | 9.17% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 6.59% | 12.81% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 7.61% | 11.69% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.18 | 2.86 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.70 | 3.83 |
Omega Ratio | 1.20 | 1.60 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.77 | 3.81 |
Martin Ratio | 5.16 | 18.32 |
Ulcer Index | 2.28% | 1.69% |
Daily Std Dev | 9.95% | 10.77% |
Max Drawdown | -44.27% | -33.63% |
Current Drawdown | -5.52% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMEU.L and EUNL.DE is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XMEU.L vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XMEU.L achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly lower than EUNL.DE's 22.81% return. Over the past 10 years, XMEU.L has underperformed EUNL.DE with an annualized return of 7.61%, while EUNL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMEU.L vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMEU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XMEU.L vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XMEU.L vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMEU.L nor EUNL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.12% |
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XMEU.L vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMEU.L drawdown since its inception was -44.27%, which is greater than EUNL.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMEU.L and EUNL.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XMEU.L vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) at 2.75%. This indicates that XMEU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.