PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMEU.L vs. UD03.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMEU.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMEU.L achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly lower than UD03.L's 12.28% return.


XMEU.L

1D
0.54%
1M
1.15%
YTD
6.81%
6M
8.75%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
10.17%

UD03.L

1D
0.26%
1M
2.79%
YTD
12.28%
6M
14.98%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMEU.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XMEU.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C
6.81%25.81%3.60%13.26%-3.48%16.84%2.45%1.17%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
12.28%25.20%0.78%19.24%-4.62%10.81%5.72%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XMEU.L and UD03.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019

0.25

Over the past year, XMEU.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.

XMEU.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMEU.L
UD03.L

Financial Services

23.6%
28.5%

Industrials

20.2%
12.1%

Healthcare

13.3%
4.1%

Technology

8.7%
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
7.0%

Energy

5.4%
2.7%

Basic Materials

5.0%
4.2%

Utilities

4.8%
7.7%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.1%

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Financial Services

XMEU.L
23.6%
UD03.L
28.5%

Industrials

XMEU.L
20.2%
UD03.L
12.1%

Healthcare

XMEU.L
13.3%
UD03.L
4.1%

Technology

XMEU.L
8.7%
UD03.L
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

XMEU.L
8.0%
UD03.L
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XMEU.L
6.4%
UD03.L
7.0%

Energy

XMEU.L
5.4%
UD03.L
2.7%

Basic Materials

XMEU.L
5.0%
UD03.L
4.2%

Utilities

XMEU.L
4.8%
UD03.L
7.7%

Communication Services

XMEU.L
3.7%
UD03.L
3.1%

Real Estate

XMEU.L
0.8%
UD03.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMEU.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMEU.L
XMEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XMEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

UD03.L
UD03.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UD03.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD03.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD03.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UD03.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD03.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMEU.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMEU.LUD03.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.61

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

5.70

-3.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

16.25

-9.60

XMEU.L vs. UD03.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the UD03.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMEU.L and UD03.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMEU.LUD03.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

3.47

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

1.75

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

1.19

-0.76

Drawdowns

XMEU.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMEU.L drawdown since its inception was -44.27%, which is greater than UD03.L's maximum drawdown of -30.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMEU.L and UD03.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMEU.LUD03.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.27%

-30.85%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-9.80%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.16%

-11.72%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.60%

-18.67%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-1.19%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-3.31%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

3.56%

-0.70%

Volatility

XMEU.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that XMEU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UD03.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMEU.LUD03.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

3.58%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

16.13%

-4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

27.46%

-13.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.86%

47.29%

-32.43%

XMEU.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMEU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMEU.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison

XMEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UD03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.54%2.97%2.84%3.67%3.96%3.50%2.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMEU.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMEU.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMEU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMEU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UD03.L.

XMEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XMEU.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMEU.L and UD03.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer