PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMEU.L vs. LCUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMEU.L vs. LCUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XMEU.L is traded in GBp, while LCUK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the LCUK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMEU.L achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly higher than LCUK.L's 5.93% return.


XMEU.L

1D
0.54%
1M
1.15%
YTD
6.81%
6M
8.75%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
10.17%

LCUK.L

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
5.93%
6M
5.41%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
13.40%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMEU.L vs. LCUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XMEU.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C
6.81%25.81%3.60%13.26%-3.48%16.84%2.45%19.45%-2.92%
LCUK.L
Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
5.93%21.01%9.05%7.25%2.15%18.06%-11.83%18.73%-0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between XMEU.L and LCUK.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018

0.85

The correlation between XMEU.L and LCUK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMEU.L vs. LCUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMEU.L
LCUK.L

Financial Services

23.6%
24.2%

Industrials

20.2%
13.9%

Healthcare

13.3%
13.2%

Technology

8.7%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
5.2%

Energy

5.4%
11.1%

Basic Materials

5.0%
8.3%

Utilities

4.8%
5.1%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.0%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.4%

Financial Services

XMEU.L
23.6%
LCUK.L
24.2%

Industrials

XMEU.L
20.2%
LCUK.L
13.9%

Healthcare

XMEU.L
13.3%
LCUK.L
13.2%

Technology

XMEU.L
8.7%
LCUK.L
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

XMEU.L
8.0%
LCUK.L
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XMEU.L
6.4%
LCUK.L
5.2%

Energy

XMEU.L
5.4%
LCUK.L
11.1%

Basic Materials

XMEU.L
5.0%
LCUK.L
8.3%

Utilities

XMEU.L
4.8%
LCUK.L
5.1%

Communication Services

XMEU.L
3.7%
LCUK.L
3.0%

Real Estate

XMEU.L
0.8%
LCUK.L
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMEU.L vs. LCUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMEU.L
XMEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XMEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUK.L
LCUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMEU.L vs. LCUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMEU.LLCUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.80

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

5.79

+0.86

XMEU.L vs. LCUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMEU.L and LCUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMEU.LLCUK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.38

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.77

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.51

-0.08

Drawdowns

XMEU.L vs. LCUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMEU.L drawdown since its inception was -44.27%, which is greater than LCUK.L's maximum drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMEU.L and LCUK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMEU.LLCUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.27%

-35.54%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-9.13%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.16%

-12.65%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.60%

-12.65%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-3.98%

+2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-4.97%

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.85%

+0.01%

Volatility

XMEU.L vs. LCUK.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) have volatilities of 3.78% and 3.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMEU.LLCUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

3.76%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

10.20%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

11.92%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

12.97%

+0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.86%

15.69%

-0.83%

XMEU.L vs. LCUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMEU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUK.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XMEU.L vs. LCUK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMEU.L nor LCUK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LCUK.L
Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%3.68%3.05%3.94%3.86%3.00%3.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMEU.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMEU.L and LCUK.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XMEU.L.

XMEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while LCUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XMEU.L and 0.04% for LCUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMEU.L and LCUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer