XMEU.L vs. CS1.L
XMEU.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C) and CS1.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - XMEU.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while CS1.L tracks the BME IBEX 35 NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMEU.L returned 10.86%/yr vs 13.79%/yr for CS1.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMEU.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CS1.L.
Performance
XMEU.L vs. CS1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMEU.L achieves a 9.34% return, which is significantly lower than CS1.L's 13.19% return. Over the past 10 years, XMEU.L has underperformed CS1.L with an annualized return of 10.86%, while CS1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.79% annualized return.
XMEU.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 9.34%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 23.62%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.26%
- 10Y*
- 10.86%
CS1.L
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 6.47%
- YTD
- 13.19%
- 6M
- 13.97%
- 1Y
- 47.56%
- 3Y*
- 33.09%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
XMEU.L vs. CS1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMEU.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C | 9.34% | 25.81% | 3.60% | 13.26% | -3.48% | 16.84% | 2.45% | 19.45% | -9.44% | 14.82% |
CS1.L Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) | 13.19% | 62.63% | 14.12% | 24.14% | 4.89% | 0.59% | -7.48% | 8.06% | -11.27% | 15.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMEU.L and CS1.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2008 | 0.78 |
The correlation between XMEU.L and CS1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMEU.L vs. CS1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMEU.L
CS1.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
XMEU.L
CS1.L
Industrials
XMEU.L
CS1.L
Healthcare
XMEU.L
CS1.L
Technology
XMEU.L
CS1.L
Consumer Defensive
XMEU.L
CS1.L
Consumer Cyclical
XMEU.L
CS1.L
Basic Materials
XMEU.L
CS1.L
Energy
XMEU.L
CS1.L
Utilities
XMEU.L
CS1.L
Communication Services
XMEU.L
CS1.L
Real Estate
XMEU.L
CS1.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMEU.L vs. CS1.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMEU.L
CS1.L
XMEU.L vs. CS1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMEU.L | CS1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.53 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 4.58 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.27 | 15.54 | -7.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMEU.L vs. CS1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMEU.L drawdown since its inception was -99.42%, which is greater than CS1.L's maximum drawdown of -57.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMEU.L and CS1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMEU.L | CS1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.42% | -57.96% | -41.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -10.34% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | -12.64% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.13% | -17.57% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.78% | -38.87% | -59.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.38% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.87% | -17.28% | -10.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 3.05% | -0.20% |
Volatility
XMEU.L vs. CS1.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) is 2.90%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that XMEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CS1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMEU.L | CS1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 3.92% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 13.63% | -3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 16.25% | -4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.38% | 18.78% | +4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,446.80% | 19.32% | +2,427.48% |
XMEU.L vs. CS1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMEU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CS1.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMEU.L vs. CS1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMEU.L nor CS1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMEU.L and CS1.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMEU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMEU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CS1.L.
XMEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while CS1.L tracks BME IBEX 35 NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XMEU.L and 0.25% for CS1.L.
Find the right allocation for XMEU.L and CS1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer