PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CS1.L vs. EGRW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CS1.L vs. EGRW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) and WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR (EGRW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CS1.L is traded in GBp, while EGRW.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EGRW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CS1.L having a 5.33% return and EGRW.L slightly lower at 5.25%.


CS1.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
1.96%
YTD
5.33%
6M
9.86%
1Y
36.01%
3Y*
29.61%
5Y*
19.19%
10Y*
12.14%

EGRW.L

1D
-0.76%
1M
5.80%
YTD
5.25%
6M
7.69%
1Y
13.60%
3Y*
7.07%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CS1.L vs. EGRW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CS1.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)
5.33%62.63%14.12%24.14%4.89%0.59%-7.48%8.06%-11.27%-4.17%
EGRW.L
WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR
5.25%18.91%-6.80%18.08%-15.26%15.24%13.07%26.23%-12.28%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CS1.L and EGRW.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.32

Over the past year, CS1.L and EGRW.L have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

CS1.L vs. EGRW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CS1.L
EGRW.L

Financial Services

40.3%
17.0%

Utilities

19.0%
0.2%

Industrials

15.8%
24.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
23.1%

Real Estate

3.3%
0.3%

Technology

3.2%
9.6%

Energy

2.8%
1.2%

Communication Services

2.4%
9.3%

Basic Materials

1.3%
2.7%

Healthcare

0.7%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
0.9%

Financial Services

CS1.L
40.3%
EGRW.L
17.0%

Utilities

CS1.L
19.0%
EGRW.L
0.2%

Industrials

CS1.L
15.8%
EGRW.L
24.4%

Consumer Cyclical

CS1.L
10.8%
EGRW.L
23.1%

Real Estate

CS1.L
3.3%
EGRW.L
0.3%

Technology

CS1.L
3.2%
EGRW.L
9.6%

Energy

CS1.L
2.8%
EGRW.L
1.2%

Communication Services

CS1.L
2.4%
EGRW.L
9.3%

Basic Materials

CS1.L
1.3%
EGRW.L
2.7%

Healthcare

CS1.L
0.7%
EGRW.L
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

CS1.L
0.3%
EGRW.L
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CS1.L vs. EGRW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CS1.L
CS1.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CS1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CS1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CS1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CS1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
CS1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

EGRW.L
EGRW.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
EGRW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGRW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGRW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
EGRW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGRW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CS1.L vs. EGRW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) and WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR (EGRW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CS1.LEGRW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.17

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

1.17

+2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

3.78

+7.92

CS1.L vs. EGRW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CS1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the EGRW.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CS1.L and EGRW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CS1.LEGRW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

0.87

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

0.33

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.59

-0.10

Drawdowns

CS1.L vs. EGRW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CS1.L drawdown since its inception was -38.87%, which is greater than EGRW.L's maximum drawdown of -27.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CS1.L and EGRW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CS1.LEGRW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.87%

-27.45%

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.34%

-12.17%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.34%

-14.93%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.82%

-27.45%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-0.76%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.35%

-5.86%

-4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

3.69%

-0.62%

Volatility

CS1.L vs. EGRW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) is 4.77%, while WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR (EGRW.L) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that CS1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGRW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CS1.LEGRW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

5.42%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.35%

13.38%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

16.41%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

20.72%

-4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.49%

24.07%

-5.58%

CS1.L vs. EGRW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CS1.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EGRW.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CS1.L vs. EGRW.L - Dividend Comparison

CS1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EGRW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CS1.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EGRW.L
WisdomTree Eurozone Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - EUR
2.09%2.15%2.28%2.00%2.30%1.72%1.04%1.61%1.94%1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


CS1.L and EGRW.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CS1.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CS1.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for EGRW.L.

CS1.L tracks BME IBEX 35 NR EUR, while EGRW.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CS1.L and 0.29% for EGRW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CS1.L and EGRW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer