PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XMD.TO vs. CLSA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XMD.TO vs. CLSA.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XMD.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF) and CLSA.TO (Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. XMD.TO is passively managed, while CLSA.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, XMD.TO returned 46.80% vs 70.18% for CLSA.TO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

XMD.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF (XMD.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMD.TO achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly lower than CLSA.TO's 20.72% return.

XMD.TO

1D
-1.61%
1M
4.02%
YTD
12.81%
6M
15.57%
1Y
46.80%
3Y*
27.16%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
11.90%

CLSA.TO

1D
0.25%
1M
7.37%
YTD
20.72%
6M
30.07%
1Y
70.18%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMD.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
XMD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF		12.81%40.50%
CLSA.TO
Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF		20.72%56.35%

Correlation

The correlation between XMD.TO and CLSA.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF

Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF

Often compared with XMD.TO:
XMD.TO vs. XCS.TOXMD.TO vs. XIU.TOXMD.TO vs. CGL-C.TOXMD.TO vs. VFV.TOXMD.TO vs. XCSR.TOXMD.TO vs. XCG.TOXMD.TO vs. VUN.TO
Often compared with CLSA.TO:
CLSA.TO vs. HDIV.TOCLSA.TO vs. HBNK.TOCLSA.TO vs. HEQL.TOCLSA.TO vs. LBS.TOCLSA.TO vs. BMAX.TOCLSA.TO vs. SPLT.TOCLSA.TO vs. BANK.TO

Return for Risk

XMD.TO vs. CLSA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XMD.TO
XMD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XMD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XMD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO
CLSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMD.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF (XMD.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XMD.TOCLSA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.47
4.87

-2.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.96
5.65

-2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.96

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

6.54

-3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.51

28.01

-16.50

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMD.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is lower than the CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMD.TO and CLSA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XMD.TOCLSA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

4.87

-2.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

4.25

-3.70

Drawdowns

XMD.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMD.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.42%, which is greater than CLSA.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMD.TO and CLSA.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XMD.TOCLSA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.42%

-11.73%

-41.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.12%

-10.78%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.16%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.40%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.17%

-1.09%

-3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-1.37%

-6.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

2.51%

+1.57%

Volatility

XMD.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF (XMD.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) at 3.14%. This indicates that XMD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XMD.TOCLSA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

3.14%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.26%

12.36%

+3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.08%

14.48%

+4.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

16.54%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

16.54%

+0.39%

XMD.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XMD.TO and CLSA.TO have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

XMD.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Dividend Comparison

XMD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than CLSA.TO's 10.76% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLSA.TO
Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF		10.76%7.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF		0.83%0.97%1.58%1.91%2.24%1.17%1.91%2.55%2.44%1.76%1.97%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

XMD.TO and CLSA.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMD.TO and CLSA.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Brompton Funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMD.TO and CLSA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer