XMBR.L vs. XCX5.L
XMBR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C) and XCX5.L (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XMBR.L is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil NR USD, while XCX5.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMBR.L returned 8.80%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for XCX5.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMBR.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XCX5.L.
Performance
XMBR.L vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMBR.L achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than XCX5.L's -12.70% return. Over the past 10 years, XMBR.L has outperformed XCX5.L with an annualized return of 8.80%, while XCX5.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.44% annualized return.
XMBR.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -11.96%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 3.14%
- 1Y
- 34.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
XCX5.L
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -12.70%
- 6M
- -12.76%
- 1Y
- -12.07%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
XMBR.L vs. XCX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMBR.L Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C | 9.05% | 38.26% | -28.61% | 25.42% | 25.85% | -17.12% | -21.96% | 20.39% | 4.70% | 12.88% |
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -12.70% | -5.16% | 11.92% | 12.56% | 2.33% | 26.19% | 9.49% | 2.58% | -3.56% | 24.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMBR.L and XCX5.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010 | 0.35 |
The correlation between XMBR.L and XCX5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMBR.L vs. XCX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMBR.L
XCX5.L
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
XMBR.L
XCX5.L
Energy
XMBR.L
XCX5.L
Basic Materials
XMBR.L
XCX5.L
Utilities
XMBR.L
XCX5.L
Industrials
XMBR.L
XCX5.L
Consumer Defensive
XMBR.L
XCX5.L
Healthcare
XMBR.L
XCX5.L
Communication Services
XMBR.L
XCX5.L
Consumer Cyclical
XMBR.L
XCX5.L
Technology
XMBR.L
XCX5.L
Real Estate
XMBR.L
-
XCX5.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMBR.L vs. XCX5.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMBR.L
XCX5.L
XMBR.L vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMBR.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.89 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | -0.60 | +2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.28 | -1.37 | +8.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMBR.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | -0.76 | +2.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.26 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.37 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.23 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
XMBR.L vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMBR.L drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, which is greater than XCX5.L's maximum drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMBR.L and XCX5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMBR.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.01% | -41.74% | -30.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.06% | -19.88% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.72% | -26.47% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.62% | -26.47% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.50% | -37.35% | -16.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.06% | -23.06% | +7.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.83% | -11.04% | -16.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 8.81% | -4.08% |
Volatility
XMBR.L vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L) is 5.57%, while Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that XMBR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMBR.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 6.39% | -0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 13.26% | +4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.08% | 15.78% | +5.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 15.92% | +9.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.26% | 19.89% | +11.37% |
XMBR.L vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMBR.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMBR.L vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMBR.L nor XCX5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMBR.L and XCX5.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMBR.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMBR.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XCX5.L.
XMBR.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while XCX5.L is Asia Pacific Equities. XMBR.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD, while XCX5.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XMBR.L and 0.75% for XCX5.L.
Find the right allocation for XMBR.L and XCX5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer