XMBR.L vs. XMLA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L) and Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L).
XMBR.L and XMLA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMBR.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI Brazil NR USD. It was launched on Jun 22, 2007. XMLA.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. It was launched on Jun 22, 2007. Both XMBR.L and XMLA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XMBR.L vs. XMLA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XMBR.L vs. XMLA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMBR.L Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C | 22.07% | 38.26% | -28.61% | 25.42% | 25.85% | -17.12% | -21.96% | 20.39% | 4.70% | 12.88% |
XMLA.L Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 17.05% | 47.26% | -28.14% | 19.29% | 15.56% | -17.92% | -16.50% | 12.08% | -1.16% | 11.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMBR.L achieves a 22.07% return, which is significantly higher than XMLA.L's 17.05% return. Over the past 10 years, XMBR.L has outperformed XMLA.L with an annualized return of 10.03%, while XMLA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.26% annualized return.
XMBR.L
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 22.07%
- 6M
- 32.35%
- 1Y
- 51.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
XMLA.L
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 17.05%
- 6M
- 26.41%
- 1Y
- 53.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.31%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 6.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMBR.L vs. XMLA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XMBR.L and XMLA.L have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Return for Risk
XMBR.L vs. XMLA.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMBR.L
XMLA.L
XMBR.L vs. XMLA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L) and Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMBR.L | XMLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.29 | 2.79 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.92 | 3.55 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.48 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.46 | 5.71 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 17.43 | -3.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMBR.L | XMLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 2.79 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.43 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.25 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between XMBR.L and XMLA.L is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XMBR.L vs. XMLA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMBR.L nor XMLA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XMBR.L vs. XMLA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMBR.L drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, which is greater than XMLA.L's maximum drawdown of -59.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMBR.L and XMLA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMBR.L | XMLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.01% | -59.62% | -12.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | -9.37% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.62% | -30.25% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.50% | -49.07% | -4.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -1.95% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.03% | -25.36% | -2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 3.07% | +0.67% |
Volatility
XMBR.L vs. XMLA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L) is 7.74%, while Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that XMBR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMLA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XMBR.L | XMLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 8.47% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.87% | 14.39% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.19% | 19.10% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 21.20% | +4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.53% | 25.22% | +6.31% |