XMBR.L vs. UUP
XMBR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C) and UUP (Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XMBR.L is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil NR USD, while UUP is a Currency fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMBR.L returned 8.80%/yr vs 3.96%/yr for UUP. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. XMBR.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UUP.
Performance
XMBR.L vs. UUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XMBR.L is traded in GBp, while UUP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UUP values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMBR.L achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, XMBR.L has outperformed UUP with an annualized return of 8.80%, while UUP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.96% annualized return.
XMBR.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -11.96%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 3.14%
- 1Y
- 34.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
UUP
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 6.40%
- 3Y*
- 1.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 3.96%
XMBR.L vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMBR.L Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C | 9.05% | 38.26% | -28.61% | 25.42% | 25.85% | -17.12% | -21.96% | 20.39% | 4.70% | 12.88% |
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund | 3.41% | -11.76% | 15.49% | -1.55% | 22.47% | 6.74% | -9.40% | 0.13% | 13.40% | -16.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMBR.L and UUP is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2007 | -0.03 |
The correlation between XMBR.L and UUP shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.02 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMBR.L vs. UUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMBR.L
UUP
Financial Services
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
XMBR.L
UUP
Energy
XMBR.L
UUP
-
Basic Materials
XMBR.L
UUP
-
Utilities
XMBR.L
UUP
-
Industrials
XMBR.L
UUP
-
Consumer Defensive
XMBR.L
UUP
-
Healthcare
XMBR.L
UUP
-
Communication Services
XMBR.L
UUP
-
Consumer Cyclical
XMBR.L
UUP
-
Technology
XMBR.L
UUP
-
Real Estate
XMBR.L
-
UUP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMBR.L vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank
XMBR.L
UUP
XMBR.L vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMBR.L | UUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.10 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 0.71 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.28 | 1.84 | +5.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMBR.L | UUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 0.53 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.47 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.26 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.24 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
XMBR.L vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMBR.L drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -36.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMBR.L and UUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMBR.L | UUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.01% | -36.14% | -35.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.06% | -9.12% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.72% | -20.10% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.62% | -26.19% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.50% | -30.58% | -22.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.06% | -16.14% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.83% | -17.49% | -10.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 3.49% | +1.24% |
Volatility
XMBR.L vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 2.90%. This indicates that XMBR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMBR.L | UUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 2.90% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 8.94% | +8.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.08% | 12.18% | +8.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 15.12% | +10.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.26% | 15.38% | +15.88% |
XMBR.L vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMBR.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMBR.L vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison
XMBR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund | 3.33% | 3.43% | 4.48% | 6.44% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.03% | 1.08% | 0.10% |
XMBR.L Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMBR.L and UUP have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMBR.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMBR.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.
XMBR.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while UUP is Currency. XMBR.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XMBR.L and 0.75% for UUP.
Find the right allocation for XMBR.L and UUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer