XMAR vs. XLRI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMAR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XMAR returned 11.98% vs 10.04% for XLRI. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XMAR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.

Performance

XMAR vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XMAR having a 7.84% return and XLRI slightly higher at 7.92%.

XMAR

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.78%
• 6M: 7.22%
• YTD: 7.84%
• 1Y: 11.98%
• 3Y*: 10.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.64%

XLRI

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 0.85%
• 6M: 6.33%
• YTD: 7.92%
• 1Y: 10.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$67.65K	$68.45K	$64.14K
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March	$432.56K	$343.17K	$829.91K

XMAR vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March	7.84%	3.44%
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	7.92%	-0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between XMAR and XLRI is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.15

Return for Risk

XMAR vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XMAR

XMAR Risk / Return Rank: 98
XMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
XMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
XMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

XLRI

XLRI Risk / Return Rank: 36
XLRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
XLRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
XLRI Omega Ratio Rank: 33
XLRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
XLRI Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XMAR vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMAR	XLRI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.87	0.92	+2.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.44	1.29	+5.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.01	1.17	+0.84
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.14	1.42	+6.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	53.92	4.95	+48.97

XMAR vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.87, which is higher than the XLRI Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMAR and XLRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMAR vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAR drawdown since its inception was -7.29%, roughly equal to the maximum XLRI drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAR and XLRI.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMAR	XLRI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.29%	-7.12%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.48%	-7.12%	+5.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.11%	+1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.30%	-1.54%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.22%	2.03%	-1.81%

Volatility

XMAR vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) is 0.86%, while State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that XMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMAR	XLRI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.86%	3.34%	-2.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.75%	8.74%	-5.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.11%	11.02%	-7.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.47%	11.10%	-5.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.47%	11.10%	-5.63%

XMAR vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMAR vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

XMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.37%.

Position	TTM	2025
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	14.37%	6.85%
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMAR and XLRI in my portfolio?

XMAR and XLRI have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XMAR or XLRI?

XLRI has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to XMAR (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMAR dropped -7.29% vs XLRI's -7.12%.

Which ETF is better, XMAR or XLRI?

On 1-year performance, XMAR leads with 11.98% vs 10.04% for XLRI. On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XMAR or XLRI?

Over the 1-year period, XMAR has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 10.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMAR or XLRI?

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMAR or XLRI?

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 14.37%, compared with 0.00% for XMAR.

What is the main difference between XMAR and XLRI?

XMAR is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XMAR and 0.35% for XLRI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.