XMAR vs. SEPZ
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ).
XMAR and SEPZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMAR is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Mar 16, 2023. SEPZ is a passively managed fund by TrueShares that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index September. It was launched on Aug 31, 2020.
Performance
XMAR vs. SEPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XMAR vs. SEPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 1.99% | 10.30% | 10.10% | 10.30% |
SEPZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF | -3.17% | 13.18% | 18.23% | 15.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMAR achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than SEPZ's -3.17% return.
XMAR
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- 1Y
- 10.52%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEPZ
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- -1.43%
- 1Y
- 12.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMAR vs. SEPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SEPZ's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XMAR vs. SEPZ — Risk / Return Rank
XMAR
SEPZ
XMAR vs. SEPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMAR | SEPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 0.92 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 1.43 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.20 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 1.41 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.88 | 6.56 | +4.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMAR | SEPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 0.92 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.93 | 0.89 | +1.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between XMAR and SEPZ is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XMAR vs. SEPZ - Dividend Comparison
XMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEPZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF | 2.27% | 2.20% | 3.62% | 3.55% | 0.69% | 0.05% |
Drawdowns
XMAR vs. SEPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMAR drawdown since its inception was -7.29%, smaller than the maximum SEPZ drawdown of -15.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAR and SEPZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMAR | SEPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -15.22% | +7.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.79% | -9.40% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.55% | +4.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.32% | -2.91% | +2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 2.02% | -1.02% |
Volatility
XMAR vs. SEPZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) is 1.81%, while TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that XMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XMAR | SEPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | 4.04% | -2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.19% | 7.52% | -5.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.88% | 14.16% | -6.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.64% | 12.30% | -6.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.64% | 12.53% | -6.89% |