XMAR vs. APRT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March) and APRT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XMAR returned 10.80%/yr vs 13.70%/yr for APRT. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMAR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for APRT.

Performance

XMAR vs. APRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMAR achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than APRT's 9.26% return.

XMAR

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 6.44%
• 6M: 6.54%
• 1Y: 12.10%
• 3Y*: 10.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRT

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -0.08%
• YTD: 9.26%
• 6M: 9.39%
• 1Y: 17.60%
• 3Y*: 13.70%
• 5Y*: 10.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMAR vs. APRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March	6.44%	10.30%	10.10%	10.71%
APRT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF	9.26%	7.99%	15.15%	18.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XMAR and APRT is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2023	0.83

The correlation between XMAR and APRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XMAR vs. APRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAR

XMAR Risk / Return Rank: 97
XMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
XMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
XMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

APRT

APRT Risk / Return Rank: 97
APRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
APRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
APRT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
APRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
APRT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMAR vs. APRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMAR	APRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.98	3.45	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.68	5.88	+0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.06	1.85	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.22	11.11	-2.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	56.87	53.57	+3.30

XMAR vs. APRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.98, which is comparable to the APRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMAR and APRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMAR vs. APRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAR drawdown since its inception was -7.29%, smaller than the maximum APRT drawdown of -14.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAR and APRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMAR	APRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.29%	-14.98%	+7.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.48%	-1.59%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.29%	-14.98%	+7.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-0.77%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.30%	-2.04%	+1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.21%	0.33%	-0.12%

Volatility

XMAR vs. APRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) is 1.08%, while AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) has a volatility of 1.81%. This indicates that XMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMAR	APRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	1.81%	-0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.61%	4.33%	-1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.07%	5.14%	-2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.54%	10.80%	-5.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.54%	10.27%	-4.73%

XMAR vs. APRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than APRT's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMAR vs. APRT - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMAR nor APRT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
APRT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.67%
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMAR and APRT in my portfolio?

XMAR and APRT have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XMAR or APRT?

APRT has higher volatility (1.81%) compared to XMAR (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMAR dropped -7.29% vs APRT's -14.98%.

Which ETF is better, XMAR or APRT?

On 3-year performance, APRT leads with 13.70% vs 10.80% for XMAR. On fees, APRT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, XMAR has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XMAR or APRT?

Over the 3-year period, APRT has performed better with a 13.70% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMAR or APRT?

APRT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMAR or APRT?

XMAR and APRT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XMAR and APRT?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XMAR and 0.74% for APRT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs 3.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.