PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMAG vs. RAFE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMAG vs. RAFE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XMAG having a 14.15% return and RAFE slightly lower at 14.01%.


XMAG

1D
1.18%
1M
3.37%
YTD
14.15%
6M
13.13%
1Y
24.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RAFE

1D
0.45%
1M
2.36%
YTD
14.01%
6M
12.80%
1Y
29.28%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
11.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMAG vs. RAFE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
14.15%15.63%-1.52%
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
14.01%17.60%-1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XMAG and RAFE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2024

0.92

The correlation between XMAG and RAFE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMAG vs. RAFE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAG
XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

RAFE
RAFE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMAG vs. RAFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMAGRAFEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.46

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.94

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.86

15.24

-0.38

XMAG vs. RAFE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMAG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the RAFE Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMAG and RAFE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMAG vs. RAFE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAG drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum RAFE drawdown of -35.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAG and RAFE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMAGRAFEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-35.74%

+19.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-7.46%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.76%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-6.17%

+4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.93%

-0.27%

Volatility

XMAG vs. RAFE - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) at 3.72%. This indicates that XMAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAFE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMAGRAFEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

3.72%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

8.70%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

11.46%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

15.09%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.18%

19.38%

-4.20%

XMAG vs. RAFE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMAG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than RAFE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMAG vs. RAFE - Dividend Comparison

XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than RAFE's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
1.49%1.67%1.79%1.81%2.22%1.42%2.36%
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
0.45%0.51%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XMAG and RAFE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XMAG has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to RAFE (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMAG dropped -16.17% vs RAFE's -35.74%.

On 1-year performance, RAFE leads with 29.28% vs 24.56% for XMAG. On fees, RAFE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, RAFE has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RAFE has performed better with a 29.28% return vs 24.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RAFE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMAG.

RAFE has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.45% for XMAG.

XMAG tracks BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index, while RAFE tracks RAFI ESG US Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMAG and 0.30% for RAFE.

RAFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMAG and RAFE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer