PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMAG vs. AIPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMAG vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMAG achieves a 12.54% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 50.90% return.


XMAG

1D
-0.17%
1M
5.41%
YTD
12.54%
6M
13.14%
1Y
24.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIPO

1D
-0.74%
1M
3.63%
YTD
50.90%
6M
40.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMAG vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XMAG and AIPO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025

0.67

XMAG vs. AIPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMAG
AIPO

Technology

25.3%
16.5%

Financial Services

17.3%
3.6%

Healthcare

13.0%

-

Industrials

12.6%
57.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%

-

Energy

5.5%
6.9%

Communication Services

3.9%
0.5%

Utilities

3.4%
14.4%

Real Estate

2.9%
1.0%

Basic Materials

2.5%

-

Technology

XMAG
25.3%
AIPO
16.5%

Financial Services

XMAG
17.3%
AIPO
3.6%

Healthcare

XMAG
13.0%
AIPO

-

Industrials

XMAG
12.6%
AIPO
57.1%

Consumer Defensive

XMAG
7.3%
AIPO

-

Consumer Cyclical

XMAG
6.2%
AIPO

-

Energy

XMAG
5.5%
AIPO
6.9%

Communication Services

XMAG
3.9%
AIPO
0.5%

Utilities

XMAG
3.4%
AIPO
14.4%

Real Estate

XMAG
2.9%
AIPO
1.0%

Basic Materials

XMAG
2.5%
AIPO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMAG vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAG
XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

AIPO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMAG vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMAGAIPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.99

XMAG vs. AIPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMAGAIPODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

2.30

-1.20

Drawdowns

XMAG vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAG drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum AIPO drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAG and AIPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMAGAIPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-17.31%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-1.85%

+1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-4.37%

+2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

Volatility

XMAG vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMAGAIPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.10%

34.02%

-22.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.10%

34.02%

-18.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.10%

34.02%

-18.92%

XMAG vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMAG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMAG vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison

XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AIPO
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF
0.01%0.01%0.00%
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
0.46%0.51%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMAG and AIPO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.

XMAG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

XMAG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AIPO is Technology Equities. XMAG tracks BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index, while AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMAG and 0.69% for AIPO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMAG and AIPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer