XMA.TO vs. BASE.TO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XMA.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF) and BASE.TO (Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF) are both Materials funds - XMA.TO tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Materials TR while BASE.TO tracks the Solactive Materials & Mining. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMA.TO returned 19.82%/yr vs 8.84%/yr for BASE.TO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMA.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for BASE.TO.

Performance

XMA.TO vs. BASE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF (XMA.TO) and Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF (BASE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMA.TO achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly lower than BASE.TO's 20.51% return.

XMA.TO

• 1D: -4.47%
• 1M: -5.12%
• YTD: -0.42%
• 6M: -4.15%
• 1Y: 50.84%
• 3Y*: 33.97%
• 5Y*: 19.82%
• 10Y*: 12.74%

BASE.TO

• 1D: -2.79%
• 1M: -3.61%
• YTD: 20.51%
• 6M: 17.54%
• 1Y: 47.44%
• 3Y*: 15.57%
• 5Y*: 8.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMA.TO vs. BASE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XMA.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF	-0.42%	99.21%	20.72%	-2.04%	1.35%	3.32%	19.73%	19.13%
BASE.TO Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF	20.51%	30.33%	-13.56%	17.50%	-4.63%	20.04%	31.07%	7.14%

Correlation

The correlation between XMA.TO and BASE.TO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019	0.56

The correlation between XMA.TO and BASE.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMA.TO vs. BASE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMA.TO	BASE.TO
Basic Materials	98.3%	90.4%
Consumer Cyclical	1.6%	-
Industrials	0.0%	9.6%
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XMA.TO vs. BASE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMA.TO

XMA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 36
XMA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
XMA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
XMA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 38
XMA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
XMA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 32

BASE.TO

BASE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 66
BASE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BASE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BASE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
BASE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
BASE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMA.TO vs. BASE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF (XMA.TO) and Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF (BASE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMA.TO	BASE.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	2.04	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	2.64	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.34	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	3.04	-1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.65	12.44	-7.79

XMA.TO vs. BASE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the BASE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMA.TO and BASE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMA.TO vs. BASE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMA.TO drawdown since its inception was -64.42%, which is greater than BASE.TO's maximum drawdown of -33.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMA.TO and BASE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMA.TO	BASE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.42%	-33.43%	-30.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.51%	-15.68%	-12.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.51%	-24.11%	-4.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.06%	-33.43%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.81%	-8.03%	-16.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.10%	-9.26%	-17.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.97%	3.82%	+7.15%

Volatility

XMA.TO vs. BASE.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF (XMA.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.06% compared to Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF (BASE.TO) at 7.88%. This indicates that XMA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BASE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMA.TO	BASE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.06%	7.88%	+7.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.41%	18.86%	+14.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.44%	23.41%	+16.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.14%	23.10%	+5.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.87%	26.40%	+0.47%

XMA.TO vs. BASE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMA.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BASE.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMA.TO vs. BASE.TO - Dividend Comparison

XMA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than BASE.TO's 8.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BASE.TO Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF	8.45%	9.55%	11.20%	8.80%	8.96%	5.95%	4.67%	2.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMA.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF	0.40%	0.41%	0.83%	1.26%	1.24%	0.87%	0.63%	0.64%	0.75%	0.47%	0.82%	1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMA.TO and BASE.TO in my portfolio?

XMA.TO and BASE.TO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMA.TO or BASE.TO?

On fees, BASE.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMA.TO or BASE.TO?

BASE.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XMA.TO.

What is the main difference between XMA.TO and BASE.TO?

XMA.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Materials TR, while BASE.TO tracks Solactive Materials & Mining. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XMA.TO and 0.00% for BASE.TO.