PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XM1D.DE vs. XNKY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XM1D.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (XM1D.DE) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XM1D.DE achieves a 17.34% return, which is significantly lower than XNKY.DE's 32.35% return.


XM1D.DE

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.75%
YTD
17.34%
6M
17.24%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10Y*

XNKY.DE

1D
-1.43%
1M
7.59%
YTD
32.35%
6M
30.39%
1Y
60.72%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XM1D.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XM1D.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
17.34%12.60%13.72%13.20%
XNKY.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF
32.35%16.16%14.34%13.38%

Correlation

The correlation between XM1D.DE and XNKY.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2023

0.89

The correlation between XM1D.DE and XNKY.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XM1D.DE vs. XNKY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XM1D.DE
XM1D.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XM1D.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XM1D.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XM1D.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XM1D.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XM1D.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XNKY.DE
XNKY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XM1D.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (XM1D.DE) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XM1D.DEXNKY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

4.59

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.87

13.91

-4.04

XM1D.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XM1D.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XM1D.DE and XNKY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XM1D.DEXNKY.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.53

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.74

+0.27

Drawdowns

XM1D.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XM1D.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.92%, smaller than the maximum XNKY.DE drawdown of -21.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XM1D.DE and XNKY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XM1D.DEXNKY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.92%

-21.47%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-12.99%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.92%

-20.16%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-1.43%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-7.84%

+4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

4.29%

-1.15%

Volatility

XM1D.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (XM1D.DE) is 3.78%, while Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that XM1D.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNKY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XM1D.DEXNKY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

6.59%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.14%

18.61%

-3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.86%

23.59%

-4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

18.57%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.68%

18.42%

-0.74%

XM1D.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XM1D.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XNKY.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XM1D.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Dividend Comparison

XM1D.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while XNKY.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
XM1D.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
1.47%1.71%2.68%1.64%
XNKY.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XM1D.DE and XNKY.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XNKY.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNKY.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XM1D.DE.

XM1D.DE tracks MSCI Japan, while XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XM1D.DE and 0.09% for XNKY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XM1D.DE and XNKY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer