XLYP.L vs. XSCD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLYP.L (Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF) and XSCD.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, from Invesco and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLYP.L returned 9.67%/yr vs 8.68%/yr for XSCD.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLYP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSCD.L.

Performance

XLYP.L vs. XSCD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLYP.L achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than XSCD.L's -0.15% return.

XLYP.L

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: -2.69%
• 6M: -1.86%
• 1Y: 10.71%
• 3Y*: 12.55%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: 13.68%

XSCD.L

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: -0.15%
• 6M: 0.19%
• 1Y: 13.60%
• 3Y*: 14.54%
• 5Y*: 8.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLYP.L vs. XSCD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XLYP.L Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF	-2.69%	0.23%	30.67%	32.31%	-26.14%	30.65%	26.64%
XSCD.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D	-0.15%	-1.95%	35.07%	37.43%	-32.18%	23.87%	47.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XLYP.L and XSCD.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2020	0.63

The correlation between XLYP.L and XSCD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.74 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLYP.L vs. XSCD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLYP.L	XSCD.L
Consumer Cyclical	98.8%	97.8%
Technology	1.0%	0.8%
Industrials	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLYP.L vs. XSCD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLYP.L

XLYP.L Risk / Return Rank: 20
XLYP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
XLYP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
XLYP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 20
XLYP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
XLYP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 20

XSCD.L

XSCD.L Risk / Return Rank: 30
XSCD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
XSCD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
XSCD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 28
XSCD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
XSCD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLYP.L vs. XSCD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLYP.L	XSCD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	1.05	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	1.66	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.19	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	1.60	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.32	3.86	-1.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLYP.L vs. XSCD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLYP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the XSCD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLYP.L and XSCD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLYP.L	XSCD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68	1.05	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.49	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.78	-0.03

Drawdowns

XLYP.L vs. XSCD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLYP.L drawdown since its inception was -30.40%, smaller than the maximum XSCD.L drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLYP.L and XSCD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLYP.L	XSCD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.40%	-34.70%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.73%	-13.94%	+1.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.52%	-28.07%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.40%	-34.70%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.66%	-5.97%	-0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.54%	-11.89%	+5.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.60%	12.30%	-7.70%

Volatility

XLYP.L vs. XSCD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) is 5.00%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that XLYP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSCD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLYP.L	XSCD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.00%	5.38%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.81%	14.78%	-2.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.81%	21.17%	-5.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.40%	26.69%	-6.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.86%	29.89%	-10.03%

XLYP.L vs. XSCD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLYP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than XSCD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLYP.L vs. XSCD.L - Dividend Comparison

XLYP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSCD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XLYP.L Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XSCD.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D	0.45%	0.44%	0.40%	0.60%	0.88%	0.36%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLYP.L and XSCD.L in my portfolio?

XLYP.L and XSCD.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLYP.L or XSCD.L?

On fees, XSCD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLYP.L or XSCD.L?

XSCD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLYP.L.

What is the main difference between XLYP.L and XSCD.L?

Both ETFs track Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLYP.L and 0.12% for XSCD.L.